Michigan House Bill HB5054

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/24/25
• Refer: 9/24/25
• Report Pass: 11/5/25
• Engrossed: 12/17/25
• Refer: 1/14/26

Caption

Health: pharmaceuticals; administration of epinephrine; modify. Amends secs. 1178 & 1179 of 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1178 & 380.1179). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5049'25, HB 5050'25, HB 5051'25, HB 5052'25, HB 5053'25

Impact

The proposed amendments to sections 1178 and 1179 of the Revised School Code would formally allow students to possess and use asthma inhalers and epinephrine auto-injectors while at school or during school-sponsored activities, contingent upon proper approvals from parents or guardians and healthcare providers. This law intends to empower students with the ability to manage their health needs actively, potentially improving outcomes during emergencies where timely medication is crucial.

Summary

House Bill 5054 aims to amend the Revised School Code primarily to enhance the safety and health of students in Michigan schools by allowing designated school personnel to administer medical treatments, such as epinephrine auto-injectors and inhalers, to students facing health emergencies. Under this bill, school employees are provided legal immunity from criminal and civil liabilities when administering medications in good faith, as long as they meet certain conditions. This legislative move seeks to reduce the risks associated with life-threatening allergic reactions and asthma attacks that could occur during school hours or events.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 5054 appears to be positive among educational and health advocacy groups, who see the necessity of ensuring that students with life-threatening conditions can access their medication in a timely manner. Proponents argue that the bill enhances student safety and supports healthier school environments. However, some concerns raised involve the potential pressures on school staff to administer medications without adequate training, leading to discussions about the requirements for training and the provision of emergency care plans.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the responsibilities of school personnel and the adequacy of the training they would receive for administering medications. While the bill provides immunity to school staff, critics may argue that it still places a burden on them to act in emergencies. Additionally, discussions have emerged about ensuring that schools are adequately equipped and that emergency protocols are clear to avoid any mishaps associated with administering medications such as epinephrine.