Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

Michigan House Bill HB4267

Introduced
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/20/25  

Caption

House Bill 4267 of 2025

Summary

House Bill 4267 amends the Michigan Memorial Highway Act to designate a specific segment of M-6 in Kent County as the "Keagan Spencer Memorial Highway." The named portion runs from the intersection of M-6 and Kalamazoo Avenue east to the intersection of M-6 and 60th Street. The bill is a commemorative roadway designation and does not create a new program, regulatory scheme, or funding mechanism. In practical terms, the bill adds a new section to 2001 PA 142, which governs memorial highway naming in Michigan. If enacted, state transportation and highway signage authorities would be responsible for recognizing the designation and, as applicable, installing or maintaining memorial markers for the named segment. The bill affects the legal naming of a highway segment in Kent County but does not alter traffic rules, property rights, or roadway jurisdiction.

Impact

The bill would amend 2001 PA 142 (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2092) by adding section 94a, thereby expanding the list of officially designated memorial highways in Michigan. Its legal effect is limited to the naming of the M-6 segment in Kent County as the Keagan Spencer Memorial Highway, with any implementation likely involving highway signage and related administrative recognition by state transportation officials. No broader changes to substantive state law are made.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests broad support for the bill. It was reported from committee without amendment on a 15-0 vote and later passed the House on third reading by a wide margin, 104-3, with immediate effect. The lack of recorded committee testimony or debate indicates the measure was likely viewed as a straightforward honorary designation rather than a controversial policy change.

Contention

There is little evidence of substantive contention in the available record. The only notable point is that a small number of House members voted against immediate effect or final passage, but no transcript or recorded discussion explains their objections. Given the bill’s narrow scope, any disagreement likely related to the use of memorial highway designations generally, rather than to the specific honoree or roadway segment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.