Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

Michigan House Bill HB4145

Introduced
2/26/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/20/25  

Caption

House Bill 4145 of 2025

Summary

House Bill 4145 amends the Michigan Memorial Highway Act to designate a specific segment of US-127 in Jackson County, between mile markers 39 and 40, as the "2nd Lt. Roosevelt Stiger Memorial Highway." The bill is a commemorative roadway designation and does not alter traffic rules, funding formulas, or highway operations. Its purpose is to honor 2nd Lt. Roosevelt Stiger through an official state highway naming. Because the bill adds a new section to 2001 PA 142, it expands the list of memorial highways recognized under Michigan law. The practical effect is limited to the formal naming of the roadway segment and any associated signage or administrative recognition by the state transportation system and local stakeholders in Jackson County.

Impact

HB 4145 would amend the Michigan Memorial Highway Act, MCL 250.1001 to 250.2092, by adding a new memorial designation for a portion of US-127 in Jackson County. The bill affects state highway naming law and may require the Michigan Department of Transportation to recognize and potentially post signage for the memorial highway, but it does not change ownership, maintenance duties, or roadway regulation. The affected parties are primarily the state transportation authorities, Jackson County, and the community honoring 2nd Lt. Roosevelt Stiger.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests broad bipartisan support and little controversy. The bill was reported from committee without amendment on a 15-0 vote and then passed the House on third reading with immediate effect by a 107-0 vote. That unanimous support indicates the measure was viewed favorably as a ceremonial tribute rather than a substantive policy change.

Contention

There is no recorded committee testimony or visible floor debate in the provided materials, and the unanimous votes suggest no notable opposition. Any potential point of discussion would likely have been limited to the appropriateness of the memorial designation, the exact highway segment chosen, or the administrative details of signage, but none of those issues appear to have generated recorded contention in the available history.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.