Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB0585

Introduced
2/5/26  
Refer
2/5/26  
Report Pass
3/9/26  
Engrossed
3/12/26  
Refer
3/13/26  
Report Pass
4/1/26  

Caption

Human–Relevant Research Fund – Collection of Contributions – Responsible Entity

Summary

SB585 changes the entity responsible for collecting contributions to the Human–Relevant Research Fund from the Maryland Department of Health to the Department of Agriculture. The bill repeals the existing Health–General provisions governing the “Animal Testing and Research Contribution” and reenacts them in the Agriculture Article under a new subtitle titled “Human–Relevant Research Fund Contribution Collection.” Under the bill, research facilities in Maryland that are required to file USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Form 7023 must pay an annual contribution to the Department of Agriculture by January 15. The amount is tiered based on the number of animals reported on the most recent form: $5,000 for up to 100 animals, $10,000 for more than 100 but not more than 500, $55,000 for more than 500 but not more than 5,000, and $75,000 for more than 5,000 animals. The Secretary of Agriculture must distribute the collected funds to the Human–Relevant Research Fund established in the Economic Development Article. Facilities that fail to pay may face a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per day. The bill’s impact is primarily administrative and fiscal: it shifts statutory authority and collection duties from the health agency to the agriculture agency, while preserving the underlying contribution structure and enforcement mechanism. It also reinforces the state’s ability to channel these payments into the Human–Relevant Research Fund, which supports alternatives to animal testing and related research initiatives. The general sentiment reflected in the voting history appears favorable, as the bill passed third reading in both chambers with clear majorities. No committee transcript was provided, so there is no recorded debate to identify detailed arguments, but the successful votes suggest broad legislative support for the transfer of collection responsibility and continuation of the fund. Any likely contention would center on the policy of requiring research facilities to make these contributions at all, the size of the tiered payment amounts, and the shift in regulatory oversight from the Department of Health to the Department of Agriculture. Research facilities and animal research stakeholders may view the assessment as a cost burden, while supporters are likely to emphasize funding for human-relevant research and alternatives to animal testing.

Impact

SB585 repeals the existing contribution-collection provisions in the Health–General Article and creates a new subtitle in the Agriculture Article, moving responsibility for collecting Human–Relevant Research Fund contributions to the Department of Agriculture. It preserves the tiered annual payment schedule for qualifying research facilities, ties the obligation to APHIS Form 7023 reporting, authorizes civil penalties for nonpayment, and directs the collected money to the Human–Relevant Research Fund in the Economic Development Article.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been received favorably overall. It passed third reading in the Senate and House by substantial margins, indicating bipartisan or at least broad institutional support. Because no committee discussion transcript was provided, there is no detailed record of floor or committee arguments, but the voting history suggests the measure was not especially controversial at the final stage.

Contention

The main points of contention are likely the mandatory contribution requirement for research facilities, the amount of the tiered fees, and the policy choice to fund human-relevant research through assessments on animal research facilities. Another possible issue is the administrative shift from the Maryland Department of Health to the Department of Agriculture, which may raise questions about agency expertise, enforcement, and oversight. Research institutions and animal-research advocates would be the most likely opponents, while supporters would include proponents of alternatives to animal testing and funding for related research.

Companion Bills

MD HB625

Crossfiled Human-Relevant Research Fund - Collection of Contributions - Responsible Entity

Previously Filed As

MD HB0625

Human-Relevant Research Fund - Collection of Contributions - Responsible Entity

MD HB0267

Election Law - Campaign Finance Entities - Oversight and Control of Campaign Funds

MD HB0129

Public Funding - Nonprofit Entities - Reporting

MD SB901

Environment - Packaging and Paper Products - Producer Responsibility Plans

MD HB0262

State Government – Council for Open Data – Membership and Responsibilities

MD HB0992

Electronic Device Producer Responsibility Program - Established

MD SB412

Income Tax - Subtraction Modification - Maryland 529 Plan Contributions

MD SB535

Research Facilities and Testing Facilities That Use Animals - Licensing and Regulations

MD HB0082

Recordation and Transfer Taxes - Exemption for Related Business Entities - Common Law Trusts

MD SB253

Controlled Hazardous Substance Facility Permit - Research Facilities - Chemical Warfare Material Requirements

Similar Bills

HI SB1204

Relating To The University Of Hawaii.

HI SB1204

Relating To The University Of Hawaii.

CA AB1103

Controlled substances: research.

HI SB2657

Relating To Alzheimer's Disease And Related Dementias Research.

CA SB829

California Institute for Scientific Research: CalRx Initiative: vaccines.

HI HB1597

Relating To Alzheimer's Disease And Related Dementias Research.

NJ A4665

Permits certain transportation research contracts to be awarded to private research institutions of higher education and other entities.

AZ SB1722

Civil liability; fraudulent scientific research