Carbon Dioxide Capture, Removal, and Sequestration Projects - Regulations and Standards for Biochar and Wood Vault Technologies
Summary
HB817 requires the Maryland Department of the Environment, in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, to adopt regulations and standards by January 1, 2028 for permitting certain carbon removal, capture, and sequestration projects. The bill is focused on projects that use biochar or wood vault technologies, and it limits the covered projects to those certified by an internationally recognized third-party certification body. The bill’s stated purpose is to create a more appropriate regulatory framework for carbon removal activities than the current application of solid waste regulations.
The bill also directs each State agency to use available funding sources to support carbon removal projects that meet the bill’s certification criteria. In effect, it creates a State-level policy preference for certified carbon removal technologies and practices, while tying permitting and funding decisions to third-party verification. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.
Impact
HB817 adds a new section to the Environment Article, creating a statutory mandate for the Department of the Environment to develop permitting regulations and standards for specified carbon dioxide capture, removal, and sequestration projects. It also requires coordination with the Department of Agriculture and directs State agencies to seek funding for eligible carbon removal projects. The bill affects project developers using biochar or wood vault technologies, as well as State agencies responsible for environmental permitting and funding decisions.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests generally favorable support for the bill, with the House passing it on third reading by a substantial margin of 101 yeas to 22 nays. No committee transcript excerpts were provided, so there is no recorded discussion to indicate detailed support or opposition arguments. The bill’s framing as a modernization of carbon removal regulation suggests it was viewed positively by a majority as a climate and environmental policy measure.
Contention
The main point of contention appears to be the scope and regulatory approach for carbon removal projects. Supporters likely favor creating a dedicated permitting framework and encouraging certified carbon removal technologies, while opponents may be concerned about State endorsement of emerging technologies, the use of public funding, or the requirement that agencies prioritize projects certified by third-party bodies. The bill’s shift away from treating these projects under solid waste regulations may also be controversial for those concerned about environmental oversight or implementation standards.