Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB597

Introduced
1/28/26  
Refer
1/28/26  
Report Pass
3/19/26  
Engrossed
3/19/26  
Refer
3/20/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Enrolled
4/10/26  
Chaptered
4/28/26  

Caption

Montgomery County - Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program - Alterations MC 17-26

Summary

HB597 alters the timeline for Montgomery County’s Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program, a local electricity procurement pilot authorized under Maryland public utilities law. The bill changes when the pilot begins and ends, moving the default start date from April 1, 2024 to April 1, 2026, and extending the pilot from seven years to nine years after its beginning date, while preserving the requirement that it not end before April 1, 2031. The bill also adjusts the reporting schedule for the Public Service Commission. Instead of reporting on the pilot’s status and effectiveness in the sixth year, the Commission must now report by April 1 of the seventh year after the pilot begins. In addition, the final study and report on the pilot’s costs, benefits, and any cost-shifting effects on standard offer service customers is moved from December 31, 2031 to December 31, 2035. The Commission must still consult the Community Choice Energy Workgroup in preparing that study.

Impact

HB597 amends § 7-510.3 of the Public Utilities Article, but only as applied to Montgomery County, by extending and rescheduling the Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program and its required oversight reports. The practical effect is to give the county more time to launch and operate the pilot, and to give regulators and lawmakers a longer window to evaluate its performance, customer impacts, and potential cost protections for standard offer service customers.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have broad legislative support. It passed the House unanimously and passed the Senate with a strong majority, indicating general agreement that the pilot program should be extended and its evaluation timeline adjusted. The available record does not include committee testimony, but the vote history suggests the measure was viewed as a routine, noncontroversial update to an existing local energy pilot.

Contention

The main substantive issue embedded in the bill is whether community choice aggregation could create incremental costs for standard offer service customers when customers migrate between supply arrangements. The statute continues to require the Commission to study that question and identify mechanisms to hold those customers harmless, reflecting concern about rate impacts and cost allocation. Even so, the recorded votes show little overt opposition to the timeline changes themselves, and any contention appears limited to the underlying policy questions the pilot is meant to evaluate rather than to the bill’s amendments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.