Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB492

Introduced
1/26/26  
Introduced
1/27/26  
Refer
1/26/26  
Refer
1/27/26  
Report Pass
3/19/26  
Engrossed
3/20/26  
Refer
3/23/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  

Caption

Courtroom Security - Minimum Adequate Security Standard

Summary

HB492 establishes a statewide minimum adequate security standard for courtroom security at all courthouse facilities in Maryland. The bill directs that court security officers meet the qualifications of a special police officer under the Public Safety Article, and it sets phased staffing expectations for courtrooms during proceedings. Beginning July 1, 2027, entities responsible for courthouse security are to use best efforts to provide at least one officer in each courtroom for criminal, family, and juvenile proceedings, two officers for proceedings involving incarcerated individuals or people who may be remanded to custody, and one additional officer for every four or fewer courtrooms on each courthouse floor. Beginning July 1, 2029, the staffing expectations expand to all types of proceedings, while retaining the two-officer requirement for matters involving incarcerated individuals or possible remand and the floor-based additional officer requirement. The bill is framed as a minimum security standard rather than a strict mandate, using “best efforts” language and allowing time for implementation before the later effective staffing date. The act takes effect October 1, 2026.

Impact

The bill adds a new section, § 1-206, to the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, creating a statewide benchmark for courthouse security staffing. It affects courthouse operators and any entity responsible for providing courthouse security by setting minimum officer presence expectations in courtrooms and by tying officer qualifications to the special police officer standard in the Public Safety Article. The practical effect is to formalize security staffing policy across Maryland courthouses and likely influence staffing, budgeting, and security planning over the 2027 and 2029 implementation periods.

Sentiment

The available voting history shows strong, unanimous support in both chambers, with the House passing the bill 125-0 and the Senate passing it 34-0. The bill also moved as a Judiciary Committee measure requested by the Maryland Judicial Conference, suggesting institutional support from the court system. No committee transcript is available, but the unanimous votes indicate broad agreement that courthouse security standards should be strengthened.

Contention

No recorded opposition appears in the available materials, and the bill passed both chambers unanimously. The main policy issue implicit in the text is the feasibility of meeting the staffing targets, especially the phased expansion to all proceedings by 2029 and the requirement for additional officers on each courthouse floor. The use of “best efforts” suggests some concern about staffing availability, funding, or local implementation capacity, but no specific objections are documented in the provided record.

Companion Bills

MD SB544

Crossfiled Courtroom Security - Minimum Adequate Security Standard

Previously Filed As

MD HB789

Courtroom Security - Minimum Adequate Security Standard

MD SB621

Courtroom Security - Minimum Adequate Security

MD HB0492

Courtroom Security - Minimum Adequate Security Standard

MD SB299

Security Guards and Security Guard Employers - Registration, Certification, and Regulation

MD HB917

Corporations and Associations - Maryland Securities Act - Filing Fees

MD HB0789

Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit Eligibility - Helicopter Pilots

MD HB0978

General Assembly - Home Security System Expenses - Campaign Funds and Reimbursement

MD SB455

Security Guard Agencies - Special Police Officers - Application for Appointment

MD HB0968

Corporations and Associations - Maryland Securities Act - Filing Fees

MD SB61

Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Authorized Interception of Oral Communications - Cellular Telephones and Security Cameras

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.