Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB0460

Caption

Solar Energy - Construction of Generating Stations in Priority Preservation Areas and Study

Summary

HB0460 would narrow where solar energy generating stations may be built in Maryland’s priority preservation areas. Under current law, local jurisdictions generally may not prohibit solar generating stations that meet statutory requirements, but this bill reduces the acreage cap for approved solar projects in priority preservation areas established before January 1, 2025, from 5% to 2% of the area’s total acreage. It also keeps the existing structure that requires projects to be located in the project area and to satisfy all other requirements under the Public Utilities Article. The bill also directs the Maryland Department of the Environment to study the environmental impacts of disposing of solar photovoltaic systems at the end of their useful life and to report its findings to the General Assembly by September 30, 2027. The act would take effect October 1, 2026.

Impact

HB0460 amends § 7-218 of the Public Utilities Article to tighten the statutory limit on solar development in priority preservation areas, reducing the allowable combined acreage for solar energy generating stations from 5% to 2% in qualifying areas established before January 1, 2025. It also requires counties to report when that 2% threshold has been reached, after which the remaining acreage is no longer subject to the subsection’s prohibition. In addition, it creates a new study mandate for the Maryland Department of the Environment regarding end-of-life solar panel disposal, with a report due to the legislature in 2027.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to be framed as a land-use and environmental protection bill rather than a broad expansion of solar policy. The sponsor list is large, suggesting notable support among House members, but there are no recorded votes or committee transcripts in the provided materials to show debate or opposition. Overall, the bill’s tone is cautious toward solar siting in preserved agricultural or conservation areas while still allowing solar development elsewhere.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the reduction of the solar acreage cap in priority preservation areas, which could be viewed by solar developers and clean-energy advocates as limiting project siting opportunities, while supporters may see it as protecting farmland and preserved land from overdevelopment. A second possible area of debate is the study requirement on solar photovoltaic disposal, which may raise questions about future recycling, waste management, and environmental liability, though no specific objections are documented in the provided record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.