Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB539

Introduced
1/24/25  

Caption

Health Occupations - Prescriptions for Children Subject to Shared Custody or Visitation Schedules

Summary

SB539 would require health care providers who can prescribe medications to issue two separate prescriptions for a child when a parent presents a court-ordered or court-approved shared custody or visitation schedule. Each prescription must be written so that the amount dispensed is proportionate to the time each parent spends with the child under that schedule. The bill is aimed at making it easier for both parents in a shared custody arrangement to obtain and manage a child’s prescribed medication. The bill also requires providers authorized to dispense prescription drugs or devices to fill a prescription presented by a parent with the relevant custody or visitation order, but only for the portion of medication tied to that parent’s custodial time. The measure would take effect October 1, 2025, and would add a new section to the Health Occupations Article of the Maryland Code.

Impact

SB539 would create a new statutory requirement in the Health Occupations Article, Section 1-230, governing prescribing and dispensing practices for children of separated or divorced parents with shared custody or visitation schedules. It would affect prescribers and dispensers by mandating duplicate prescriptions and limiting dispensing to amounts proportionate to each parent’s custodial time, potentially changing pharmacy workflows, recordkeeping, and how pediatric medications are managed across households. It would also provide a clearer legal framework for parents seeking access to a child’s medication during their scheduled parenting time.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee testimony or votes, the available record suggests a straightforward, practical policy proposal with an apparent focus on facilitating medication access in shared custody situations. The bill’s sponsors and framing indicate a child- and family-centered purpose, and there is no documented opposition in the provided materials. Because no committee discussion or voting history is included, broader legislative sentiment cannot be assessed beyond the bill’s supportive framing.

Contention

The main potential point of contention is how the bill would be implemented in practice, especially the requirement that prescriptions and dispensing be proportionate to the time each parent spends with the child. That could raise questions for prescribers and pharmacists about calculating amounts, handling medications that are difficult to split by custody schedule, and ensuring compliance with court orders. Another possible issue is whether the mandate could create administrative burdens or conflicts when parents disagree about medication management, though no specific opposition is shown in the provided record.

Companion Bills

MD HB1493

Crossfiled Charles County - Student Bus Transportation Providers - Provider Displacement

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.