Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1499

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
2/13/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/15/25  
Engrossed
3/17/25  

Caption

Business Regulation - Home Improvement Contracts - Deposits

Summary

HB1499 amends Maryland’s State Finance and Procurement law to require certain long-term procurement contracts to include a clause allowing contract modification when labor-related costs rise. Specifically, for construction contracts lasting at least three years and valued above $1 million, the contract must provide for an equitable adjustment if compensation or benefits increase because of statutory changes or collective bargaining. The bill creates a similar requirement for security services contracts meeting the same duration and value thresholds. The bill also provides that any contract modification made under these new clauses is contingent on approval by the Board of Public Works. The effective date is delayed until October 1, 2026, giving agencies and contractors time to adjust procurement practices and contract language.

Impact

HB1499 changes the required terms for certain state procurement contracts in the construction and security services sectors by mandating wage-and-benefit adjustment clauses in qualifying long-term agreements. It affects the State Finance and Procurement Article, section 13-218(b), and applies only to contracts of at least three years and more than $1 million. The measure is intended to shift some labor-cost risk in state contracting to the public procurement process, while preserving oversight through Board of Public Works approval for any resulting modification.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have broad legislative support. It passed the House on third reading by a wide margin, 132-5, suggesting general agreement with the policy of allowing contract adjustments for increased labor costs in long-term state contracts. No committee transcript was provided, and the available history does not show organized opposition beyond a small minority of dissenting votes.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the fiscal and contractual impact on the state and its contractors: supporters would view the bill as a fairness measure that helps contractors absorb mandated wage or benefit increases, while critics may worry it could increase public procurement costs or reduce budget predictability. The Board of Public Works approval requirement indicates an effort to limit automatic cost increases and preserve executive oversight, which may have been important to addressing concerns about unchecked contract modifications.

Companion Bills

MD SB403

Crossfiled State Procurement - Construction and Services - Contract Modification

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.