Maryland Medical Assistance Program - Provider Agencies - Wages and Leave for Personal Care Aides
HB1129 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would revise the Maryland Constitution to replace gendered references to constitutional officers with gender-neutral language. The bill updates terminology throughout provisions governing the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller, Treasurer, Secretary of State, and Adjutant General, changing words such as “he,” “his,” and “himself” to gender-neutral alternatives like “the Governor,” “the candidate,” “the Attorney General,” and “themself.” It does not appear to change the substantive powers, duties, qualifications, or structure of these offices; rather, it modernizes the constitutional text to reflect inclusive language.
The amendment would affect multiple articles of the Maryland Constitution, including Article II (Executive Department), Article V (Attorney-General and State’s Attorneys), Article VI (Treasury Department), and Article IX (Militia and Military Affairs). If adopted by voters, the revised language would become part of the Constitution after approval at the November 2026 general election. Because it is a constitutional amendment, it would supersede existing constitutional wording and require voter ratification rather than ordinary statutory enactment.
The general sentiment reflected by the bill’s sponsorship is supportive and reform-oriented, with the measure introduced by a large group of delegates. The bill text itself suggests a technical and noncontroversial purpose: updating outdated gendered references in foundational state law. No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, opposition, or amendments in the available materials.
Notable points of contention are limited in the text provided, but any discussion would likely center on whether the change is purely stylistic or whether constitutional language should be updated through a broader revision process. Another possible issue is the use of “themself” in the Governor provisions, which may draw attention from drafters or linguists, though it does not alter the offices’ legal authority. Overall, the bill appears aimed at inclusive drafting and constitutional modernization rather than policy change.
HB1129 would amend the Maryland Constitution itself, not the state code, by replacing gender-specific pronouns and references with gender-neutral terminology in provisions governing several constitutional offices. If approved by voters, the revised language would become controlling constitutional text for the executive branch, treasury department, attorney general, and militia provisions, but it would not change the underlying duties, appointment processes, qualifications, or powers of those offices. The bill therefore has a drafting and interpretive impact on state constitutional law, with no apparent direct fiscal or regulatory effect on affected parties beyond the updated official language.
The available materials indicate broadly favorable or at least noncontroversial sentiment. The bill is sponsored by many delegates and is framed as a modernization measure to make constitutional language gender-neutral. No committee testimony, recorded votes, or opposition statements were provided, so there is no evidence of organized resistance in the supplied record. Based on the text alone, the measure appears to be viewed as a technical, inclusive update rather than a substantive policy dispute.
There is no documented contention in the provided transcripts or voting history. If any concerns arise, they would likely involve drafting choices rather than policy substance, such as whether the constitutional text should be updated at all, whether the changes are sufficiently comprehensive, and whether specific replacements like “themself” are stylistically appropriate. Any disagreement would likely be between proponents of inclusive constitutional language and those preferring to preserve traditional wording or undertake broader constitutional revision.