Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB339

Introduced
1/30/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Report Pass
2/27/23  
Engrossed
3/2/23  

Caption

Election Law – Recounts – Procedures

Impact

The implementation of SB 339 will modernize and clarify recount procedures, helping to safeguard the electoral process. By requiring a clearer structure for recount methodology and record preservation, the bill seeks to enhance voter confidence in the election results. This measure aligns with ongoing efforts to improve election integrity and transparency in Maryland, as the state continues to adapt to the changing landscape of voting technologies and methods.

Summary

Senate Bill 339 aims to reform recount procedures in Maryland's election law. The bill lays out specific requirements for conducting a recount, mandating that the petitioner select the method of recount from a limited set of options. This includes rescanning ballots using the same equipment, using alternative vote tabulating equipment if available, or conducting a manual recount with voter-verifiable paper records. Additionally, the legislation stipulates how local boards of elections should preserve and store voter-verifiable paper records to ensure the integrity of the election process.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 339 appears to be positive, particularly among election officials and advocates for electoral integrity. Supporters argue that the bill will streamline the recount process and reinforce public trust in election outcomes. However, there may be some concerns from groups who fear that certain recount methods could limit transparency or exclude certain ballots from being counted satisfactorily.

Contention

While SB 339 is primarily viewed as an improvement to existing election laws, there is potential contention around the methods permitted for recounts, especially regarding the reliance on technology to count votes. Critics may argue that an over-reliance on electronic systems could lead to vulnerabilities and concerns over accuracy if not managed properly. Hence, discussions around ensuring robust manual counting processes may arise as stakeholders evaluate the balance between technological efficiency and electoral transparency.

Companion Bills

MD HB642

Crossfiled Election Law – Recounts – Procedures

Previously Filed As

MD AB930

Elections and voting procedures.

MD S1663

Revises procedures governing audits of election results.

MD HB317

Election Law - Curbside Voting - Pilot Program

MD HB641

Election Law - Curbside Voting - Pilot Program

MD HB0641

Election Law - Curbside Voting - Pilot Program

MD HB0052

AN ACT relating to elections; providing a process for certain recounts to be conducted by hand counting the votes; authorizing the secretary of state and county clerks to require recounts as specified; providing for hand counts to be requested by candidates as specified; specifying the costs of recounts; clarifying when a counting board is required to be appointed; amending dates related to elections; amending provisions related to election recount judges; requiring the completion of a hand count by the county clerk of each county in the 2026 primary and general elections; specifying requirements for the hand count; requiring rulemaking; creating an account; making conforming amendments; providing appropriations; and providing for effective dates.

MD HB2447

Relating to modernization of procedures for voting in public elections

MD HB2659

Requiring that all election audits and recounts be conducted using a hand count of paper ballots.

MD HB0232

Elections-hand counting for recounts.

MD LD600

An Act to Initiate Recounts in Tied Elections

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.