Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H2985

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
2/27/25  
Refer
8/21/25  
Engrossed
10/16/25  
Engrossed
3/30/26  
Enrolled
4/2/26  
Chaptered
4/10/26  

Caption

Authorizing Stephen Justice to take the civil service examination for the position of firefighter in the city of Haverhill notwithstanding the maximum age requirement

Summary

H2985 is a local, special act that would allow Stephen Justice of Haverhill to take the civil service examination for firefighter even though he is over the usual maximum age limit. If he meets all other qualifications, the bill would also make him eligible for certification and appointment to the Haverhill fire department. The measure is narrowly tailored to one individual and one municipality, and it takes effect immediately upon passage. The bill does not change the statewide firefighter civil service age rules generally; instead, it creates a one-person exception that overrides any conflicting general or special law, rule, or regulation. Its practical effect would be to permit the City of Haverhill to consider Stephen Justice for firefighter appointment despite the age restriction that would otherwise bar him from testing or appointment. The bill also notes that local approval has been received and that similar legislation was filed in the prior session.

Impact

This bill would create a specific statutory exception to Massachusetts civil service and firefighter age-limit requirements for Stephen Justice in Haverhill. It would not broadly amend the statewide maximum-age standard for firefighter applicants, but it would supersede any conflicting law or regulation as applied to this individual, allowing him to sit for the exam and, if otherwise qualified, be certified and appointed. The affected parties are Stephen Justice, the City of Haverhill, and the Haverhill fire department.

Sentiment

The available context suggests generally favorable treatment of the bill, or at least no recorded opposition in the materials provided. The filing includes the approval of the mayor and city council, which indicates local support for the exception. There are no committee transcripts or recorded votes in the provided record, so broader legislative sentiment cannot be measured from debate or roll call data.

Contention

The main point of contention inherent in the bill is the departure from the normal maximum-age requirement for firefighter applicants. Supporters appear to view the exception as justified for this specific candidate, especially given local approval, while any potential critics would likely focus on fairness, precedent, and the consistency of civil service standards if individual exemptions are granted. Because no committee discussion or votes are included, no explicit objections are documented in the available record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.