Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H2840

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
2/27/25  

Caption

Relative to 911 emergency communicators

Summary

H2840 is a Massachusetts bill that would amend Section 94 of chapter 32 of the General Laws, which is part of the state retirement system, by adding “911 emergency telecommunicators” to the list of covered personnel. The bill is described as an act relative to 911 emergency communicators and is intended to include these workers in the so-called heart law, a statutory benefit framework for certain public safety employees. In practical terms, the bill would extend retirement-related protections or presumptions associated with the heart law to 911 emergency telecommunicators. The measure appears to recognize the public safety role and occupational stressors of emergency dispatch and communication work by treating these employees more like other covered public safety personnel under state law.

Impact

The bill would modify chapter 32, section 94 of the Massachusetts General Laws by expanding the categories of employees eligible for heart-law coverage to include 911 emergency telecommunicators. This would affect retirement and disability-related rights for those workers and could increase the number of public employees entitled to the statute’s benefits or presumptions, with corresponding implications for state and local retirement systems and public employer costs.

Sentiment

There is no recorded committee transcript or vote history in the provided materials, so no formal debate or roll-call sentiment is available. Based on the bill’s sponsorship and subject matter, the measure appears to be presented as a supportive public-safety and worker-protection proposal, with an emphasis on recognizing the service and risks of emergency communications personnel.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided record. In general, bills expanding heart-law coverage can raise questions about fiscal impact, eligibility boundaries, and whether the covered occupation should be treated the same as other public safety roles, but no such objections are shown here. The only clear policy choice reflected in the text is whether 911 emergency telecommunicators should be added to the statutory list of covered employees.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MA S1845

Relative to 911 emergency telecommunicators inclusion in the heart bill

MA H2015

Relative to false reporting of an emergency

MA H1212

Relative to emergency insulin access

MA S1906

Relative to Massachusetts certified emergency telecommunicators

MA H1643

To protect the privacy of 911 callers

MA S1856

Relative to Massachusetts certified emergency telecommunicators

MA H2818

Relative to Massachusetts certified emergency telecommunicators

MA H2968

Relative to Massachusetts certified emergency telecommunicators

MA H823

Relative to election emergencies

MA S1156

To protect the privacy of 911 callers

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.