Requests local governing authorities to adopt abatement of public nuisances ordinances to deter illicit businesses, including massage therapy establishments operating without a license or engaging in criminal acts.
Summary
Senate Resolution 122 is a nonbinding legislative request urging local governing authorities across Louisiana to adopt ordinances that treat certain illicit businesses as public nuisances and allow for their abatement. The resolution focuses especially on massage therapy establishments operating without a license or otherwise engaged in criminal conduct, and it cites concerns about links to human trafficking, illegal solicitation, money laundering, and exploitation of vulnerable individuals.
The resolution does not change state licensing law directly. Instead, it encourages cities, parishes, and other local governments to use their police powers to create stronger civil enforcement tools, such as closure of noncompliant establishments, revocation of occupational licenses, and restrictions on future permits at locations with prior violations. It also directs that copies be sent to the Louisiana Municipal Association and the Louisiana Board of Massage Therapy for consideration and action.
Impact
SR122 has no direct statutory effect and does not amend the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Its practical impact is to encourage local governments to adopt or strengthen nuisance-abatement ordinances aimed at illicit businesses, particularly unlicensed massage establishments, and to supplement existing state regulation under the Louisiana Board of Massage Therapy, R.S. 37:3551 et seq. If adopted locally, such ordinances could expand civil enforcement options against businesses suspected of criminal activity or operating outside licensing requirements.
Sentiment
The resolution appears broadly supportive and protective in tone, with an emphasis on public safety, neighborhood integrity, and lawful economic development. Because it is a resolution rather than a regulatory bill, there is no recorded vote or committee debate in the provided materials, and no formal opposition is documented. The framing suggests the measure was intended to be viewed favorably as a local-government tool against illicit activity.
Contention
The main point of contention implicit in the resolution is the balance between stronger nuisance enforcement and the risk of overreach against legitimate massage therapy businesses. The resolution specifically targets unlicensed operators and establishments engaged in criminal acts, but the language about public nuisance abatement, immediate closure, and permit restrictions could raise concerns about due process, enforcement discretion, and potential impacts on lawful businesses. No specific lawmakers or stakeholder groups are identified in the provided record as opposing or supporting these concerns.