Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB115

Introduced
2/24/20  
Introduced
2/24/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Passed
6/11/20  

Caption

Provides relative to advertisements for legal services. (1/1/21)

Impact

If enacted, SB 115 would amend existing regulations to enhance consumer protection in the legal services marketplace. By requiring attorneys to clearly disclose their fees in advertisements, the bill seeks to mitigate the potential for confusion and deception that could adversely affect prospective clients. The Louisiana Supreme Court is also empowered to implement additional rules to further enforce these provisions, adding a layer of regulatory oversight aimed at promoting honesty in legal advertising.

Summary

Senate Bill 115 aims to regulate advertisements for legal services in order to increase transparency and protect potential clients from misleading information regarding attorney fees. The bill mandates that any advertisement referencing a monetary settlement or jury verdict must also disclose all attorney fees associated with that settlement or verdict. This information must be presented in a clear and prominent manner, ensuring that individuals seeking legal representation can make informed decisions based on the financial implications involved.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 115 has been positive among supporters who argue that it promotes transparency and helps wary clients to navigate the often complex nature of legal services. The bill has garnered bipartisan support, reflecting a shared concern over the ethical implications of misleading legal advertisements. However, some legal professionals express apprehension about the new requirements, worrying that stringent regulations may inadvertently stifle creativity and customization in legal marketing.

Contention

Despite its intent to protect consumers, there are points of contention regarding the implementation of these advertising rules. Critics argue that the requirement to disclose attorney fees alongside settlements could diminish the impact of successful case outcomes showcased in advertisements. Additionally, there may be concerns about how these regulations could be enforced and whether they might inadvertently restrict legitimate marketing practices that are crucial for law firms, especially smaller or less established ones, to attract new clients.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB262

Legal Services Advertisements

LA SB141

AN ACT relating to legal advertisements.

LA H2243

Relative to legal advertisements and public notices

LA H0915

Advertisements for Representation Services

LA S0846

Advertisements for Representation Services

LA HB915

Advertisements for Representation Services:

LA H1632

Relative to legal advertisements in online-only newspapers

LA S1279

Relative to legal advertisements in online-only newspapers

LA HB307

Advertisement For Certain Legal Money Amounts

LA SB576

Video streaming services: commercial advertisements.

Similar Bills

CA SB1050

False advertising: synthetic performers.

CA AB2717

Outdoor advertising displays: arenas: exemptions.

CA SB783

Outdoor advertising displays: redevelopment agency project areas.

CA AB840

Outdoor advertising displays: redevelopment agency project areas.

HI SB2733

Relating To Liquor.

CA AB770

Advertising displays: City of Los Angeles: exemption: ordinance.

CA SB1228

Advertising displays: exemptions: redevelopment agency projects.

AZ HB2179

Marijuana; advertising; restrictions