Louisiana House Bill HB644

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/20
• Refer: 2/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides relative to jury trials in criminal cases

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 644 will impact how jury trials are administered in Louisiana, particularly for noncapital cases. By eliminating the automatic sequestration of juries post-charge, the bill may facilitate more efficient trial proceedings and potentially reduce the costs associated with juror sequestration. It also emphasizes conducting trials within standard business hours, which aligns jury duty more closely with common working schedules, potentially increasing the convenience for jurors and optimizing court resources.

Summary

House Bill 644, introduced by Representative Jordan, seeks to modify specific provisions in Louisiana's Code of Criminal Procedure regarding jury trials in noncapital criminal cases. The bill aims to amend existing law to limit the sequestration of jurors, providing that juries shall not be sequestered after the court's charge unless ordered by the court for good cause. Additionally, it establishes specific hours during which jury trials can be conducted, mandating that they start no earlier than 9:00 a.m. and end no later than 6:00 p.m., unless exceptions are made by the trial court upon written notice.

Sentiment

The proposed legislation has elicited mixed responses among lawmakers and the public. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary reform to modernize jury trial procedures, aligning them with societal norms around time management and enhancing juror welfare by reducing unnecessary seclusion. On the other hand, there are concerns from opponents who worry that this could undermine the integrity of jury trials, particularly in cases where external influences might impede the jurors' ability to deliberate fairly in a timely manner.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provisions around jury deliberations where ongoing deliberations cannot constitute good cause for extending trial hours, although jurors may choose to continue with unanimous consent. This raises questions about the balance between administrative efficiency and ensuring that jurors have adequate time to reach a fair verdict. Additionally, the limitations on when trials may occur could lead to logistical challenges, particularly in busy court systems, raising concerns about potential backlogs.