Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB234

Introduced
2/26/20  
Refer
2/26/20  
Refer
3/9/20  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the State of Louisiana, DOTD, in "Jean Boudreaux and the Victims of the Flood on April 6, 1983 on the Tangipahoa River v. The State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB 234 will have significant implications for state budgeting and financial management. By appropriating these funds, the state acknowledges its liability to compensate the affected individuals. This financial commitment may influence future budget allocations and priorities, as it ties up a substantial amount of resources that could have been directed to other state needs. Furthermore, it reaffirms the state's accountability in legal matters concerning its operations and responsibilities, particularly with regard to the Department of Transportation.

Summary

House Bill 234 is a financial appropriations measure aiming to satisfy a long-standing judgment against the State of Louisiana stemming from a class action lawsuit titled 'Jean Boudreaux and the Victims of the Flood on April 6, 1983 on the Tangipahoa River v. The State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation, et al.' The bill allocates a total of $91,824,720.79 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2020-2021. This amount includes interest accrued since April 6, 1984, reflecting the lengthy timeline of the lawsuit and the state's obligation to the plaintiffs.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 234 appears to be one of resolution and responsibility. Legislators and the general public may view the bill as a necessary step towards rectifying a historical wrong by compensating the victims of the flood. However, there could also be discourse regarding the appropriateness of such a large appropriation from the general fund, as some might express concerns about alternative funding priorities and the need for fiscal responsibility in state governance.

Contention

While there may not be significant debate concerning the necessity of the payment itself, the contention could arise around how the funding impacts other state financial commitments. Stakeholders may question whether the financial resources allocated for HB 234 detract from other essential services or infrastructure projects. Additionally, the ongoing ramifications of a large state expenditure also provoke discussion regarding Louisiana's broader crisis management and disaster response strategies, especially in the context of climate change and natural disaster preparedness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB41

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Brunet et al. v. State of Louisiana et al.

LA HB97

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Bentz C. Braud, IV, et ux v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development

LA HB1075

Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the state in the suit captioned Dawn Marie DePedro et al. v. State of Louisiana et al.

LA HB643

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled DeRoche v DOTD et al.

LA HB569

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Anna Flowers and Brent Flowers v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development et als.

LA HB42

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Landon Howard Powell, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al

LA HB105

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the matter entitled Marchand v. State of La. et al.

LA HB1014

Appropriates funds for the payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit captioned Angela Melerine et al. v. DOTD

LA HB104

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Wilkerson v. State of La. et al.

LA HB44

Appropriates funds for payment of a consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State of La., through the Dept. of Transportation and Development v. Martin T. Frey et al.

Similar Bills

LA HB246

Provides relative to the Children's Cabinet Advisory Board

LA SR69

Commends and recognizes Film Louisiana for its contributions to economic development and designates April 15, 2026, as Film Louisiana Day at the Louisiana State Capitol

LA SR10

Requests the health profession licensing boards to work with the commissioner of administration to identify funds from their cash and cash equivalent year-end balances that can be transferred into the state general fund.

LA SR34

Commends Geaux Far Louisiana and designates Tuesday, March 24, 2026, as Geaux Far Louisiana Day at the Louisiana State Capitol.

LA HCR66

Requests Louisiana Economic Development to develop and implement a coordinated rural economic development strategy

LA HCR76

Continues the Health Inequities and Disparities in Rural Areas Task Force

LA SCR7

Establishes the Police Training, Screening, and De-escalation Task Force to study and make recommendations to the legislature.

LA HR344

Creates a task force to study substance use trends and treatment among wards of the state