Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB22

Introduced
1/24/20  
Introduced
1/24/20  
Refer
1/24/20  

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges

Impact

The removal of the mandatory retirement age is expected to have a substantial impact on the judiciary in Louisiana. Proponents of the bill argue that this amendment could lead to a more experienced judiciary, as judges could continue serving if they are deemed competent and capable. This could enhance the stability and continuity of the judicial system in the state. However, there is concern that allowing judges to serve indefinitely may hinder opportunities for younger judges and that it may be difficult to assess the competency of judges who age beyond typical retirement age.

Summary

House Bill 22 proposes a significant change to the retirement regulations for judges in Louisiana by eliminating the mandatory retirement age of 70 years. Under current law, judges must retire upon turning 70, although they are allowed to complete their current term. The proposed amendment seeks to repeal this requirement, enabling judges to serve beyond this age limit if elected by voters. This change is set to be decided by voters in a statewide election scheduled for November 3, 2020, which is an essential aspect of the legislative process for constitutional amendments.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 22 appears mixed. Supporters, including some legislators, see the bill as a necessary modernization of judicial regulations that acknowledges the capabilities of experienced judges. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns that it could lead to a stagnation of fresh judicial perspectives and the potential for a judiciary that does not reflect new societal norms or changes. The debate highlights broader issues regarding age and competency in public office, and the balance between experience and the need for new leadership.

Contention

A notable point of contention in discussions about the bill is the notion of accountability and competency as judges age. Critics worry about the implications of extending judicial terms indefinitely, particularly regarding how the public can assess a judge's fitness for office as they age. Additionally, there are discussions about the potential impact on judicial elections, as the bill could ultimately change the dynamics of these races and the kinds of candidates that are considered viable by voters. The amendment essentially invites voters to consider not just the issue of age, but also the broader principles of judicial service in Louisiana.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB63

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement of judges (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA SB86

Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (1/1/27)

LA SCR55

Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

LA SB2152

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

LA HB1528

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

LA SB175

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

LA HB638

Judges - Mandatory Retirement Age

LA HB0638

Judges - Mandatory Retirement Age

LA SB74

Judges – Mandatory Retirement Age

LA H68

Proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to changing the mandatory age of retirement for judges

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.