Requires high school governing authorities to pay the cost of certain postsecondary remedial and developmental coursework required of public high school graduates. (gov sig) (EG INCREASE LF EX See Note)
Impact
The implications of SB82 are significant for educational accountability in Louisiana. The legislation would impose a financial responsibility on high schools for the performance of their graduates in postsecondary education. Specifically, the reimbursement amount for remedial coursework cannot exceed the published tuition rates. This could result in schools being more proactive in ensuring students meet college readiness standards, potentially leading to improvements in curriculum and instruction. However, the bill limits reimbursement to two remedial courses per student and prevents payment for the same level of coursework more than once. This sets clear boundaries on fiscal responsibility while still holding schools accountable.
Summary
Senate Bill No. 82, proposed by Senator Appel, aims to enhance the transition from high school to postsecondary education by requiring public high schools in Louisiana to ensure that their graduates have the necessary skills to undertake entry-level college coursework. The bill stipulates that if a student fails to meet established college readiness benchmarks in subjects like English and mathematics, the respective public high school governing authority must reimburse public postsecondary institutions for the remedial or developmental coursework needed by the graduate. This law is designed to hold high schools accountable for adequately preparing students for college-level work.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB82 appears largely favorable among supporters who view it as a necessary step towards improving educational outcomes and accountability within Louisiana's high schools. Proponents argue that the bill would incentivize high schools to better equip students for the rigors of college. However, there are concerns among opponents regarding the financial burden this places on high schools and the implications for students who may already be facing challenges in their educational journeys. Critics worry that schools might be penalized for factors beyond their control, such as systemic issues affecting students' readiness for college.
Contention
Noteworthy points of contention include the potential fiscal implications for public high schools, particularly those serving economically disadvantaged communities. Some educators and stakeholders fear that making schools financially responsible for students' remedial needs may discourage them from adequately addressing the diverse learning needs of all students. Additionally, the limitations on reimbursements could funnel students into a cycle of remedial courses without addressing the root causes of their academic struggles. Overall, SB82 sparks a vital dialogue within the legislative framework surrounding educational equity and accountability.
Requires students to attain a minimum ACT score set by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education as a prerequisite to high school graduation and prohibits state-administered end-of-course assessments for high school students (OR -$4,300,000 GF EX See Note)
Requires that schools utilize a nationally normed assessment instead of the LEAP test for purposes of school and district accountability. (gov sig) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)