Louisiana Senate Bill SB210

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 5/1/17
• Engrossed: 5/9/17
• Refer: 5/10/17
• Report Pass: 5/18/17
• Enrolled: 6/1/17
• Chaptered: 6/12/17
• Passed: 6/12/17

Caption

Provides for an increase of commissioners to the board of Gravity Drainage District No. 2 of Livingston Parish. (gov sig)

Impact

The adjustments made by SB 210 directly affect the governing framework of local drainage districts, specifically enabling the Gravity Drainage District No. 2 to have a broader base of governance. By increasing the number of commissioners, the bill seeks to ensure that a greater diversity of opinions and interests can be represented in the oversight of drainage and water management, which is critical for environmental sustainability and public safety in the region.

Summary

Senate Bill 210, introduced by Senator Erdey, amends the membership structure of the board of commissioners for the Gravity Drainage District No. 2 of Livingston Parish. The bill proposes an increase in the size of the board from five to seven members, which is intended to enhance representation and improve decision-making within the district. This change comes in response to the needs of a growing population and the complexities associated with water management in the region.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around SB 210 appears to be positive, with local legislators and stakeholders recognizing the potential benefits of a more inclusive governing body. Proponents believe that the increased representation may lead to more effective management of drainage issues, which are vital for the community's health and safety. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the efficiency of larger boards and the potential for bureaucratic challenges.

Contention

While the bill does not seem to have sparked major controversy, as it had unanimous support during voting—evidenced by the 99-0 vote in favor—there are underlying concerns regarding the implications of governance changes. Critics might argue that a larger board could complicate decision-making processes or create challenges in coordination among members. Nonetheless, the legislative history suggests a consensus on the necessity to improve local governance in water management.