Louisiana House Bill HB338

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/17
• Refer: 3/30/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 5/2/17
• Engrossed: 5/15/17
• Refer: 5/16/17
• Report Pass: 5/24/17
• Enrolled: 6/5/17
• Chaptered: 6/16/17
• Passed: 6/16/17

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws by reinforcing the requirement that practitioners of speech-language pathology and audiology must be properly licensed or registered in order to practice legally. It stipulates various disciplinary actions for professionals found to be in violation of these laws, which includes fraud, negligent billing, and practicing under the influence of drugs. By establishing clearer guidelines and procedures for disciplinary actions, the bill aims to enhance the accountability of licensed professionals in these fields. This is seen as crucial in maintaining the integrity of healthcare practices related to speech and hearing.

Summary

House Bill 338 aims to amend and reenact several provisions relating to the Louisiana Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, as well as establish revised regulations governing the practice of speech-language pathology and audiology in Louisiana. Notable changes include the introduction of telepractice regulations, requiring in-state licensure for telehealth practitioners and a unique registration process for out-of-state practitioners. This bill also revises the composition of the board, ensuring that there is adequate representation from both fields of practice, alongside a public member to advocate for individuals with communication disorders.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 338 appears largely supportive, reflecting a collective agreement on the necessity of regulation to ensure high professional standards within speech-language pathology and audiology. Lawmakers and professional organizations have expressed that the updates proposed in the bill are essential for adapting to current practices such as telehealth, particularly in the wake of increasing reliance on remote healthcare services. However, there may be some concerns regarding the operational aspects of implementing these regulations, particularly regarding the adaptation to telepractice requirements for out-of-state providers.

Contention

Some points of contention have emerged, particularly regarding the enforcement of telehealth regulations and the rigorous conditions placed on licensure renewal and issuance. Issues may arise around how the conditional issuance of licenses is managed, possibly affecting the ability of new entrants to the profession. Additionally, there may be challenges related to the balance of power within the board, particularly as professionals seek representation that reflects the growing diversity of practices and services in speech-language pathology and audiology.