A RESOLUTION confirming the reappointment of Paul Todd Case to the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees.
Summary
SR247 is a confirmation resolution that approves the reappointment of Paul Todd Case to the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees. The resolution states that Governor Andy Beshear reappointed Case on July 24, 2025, for a term ending June 30, 2031, and that the appointment is subject to Senate confirmation under KRS 164.131. It also notes that Case has been determined to meet the statutory requirements for service on the board.
The measure does not change substantive law or create new policy; instead, it carries out the Senate’s constitutional and statutory role in confirming a gubernatorial appointment to a public university governing board. If adopted, it authorizes the clerk to notify Case and the governor of the Senate’s action and formally completes the confirmation process for the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees seat.
Impact
SR247 has a limited but direct impact on state law by confirming a specific appointee under KRS 164.131, the statute governing membership requirements and appointments to the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees. It affects the composition of the university’s governing board by allowing Paul Todd Case to continue serving through the new term, but it does not amend the statute, alter university governance rules, or impose obligations on the public beyond the appointment confirmation process.
Sentiment
The available voting history indicates broad support and little to no opposition to the resolution. The Senate adopted the measure 38-0, and the recorded third-reading vote was 37-0, suggesting a routine, noncontroversial confirmation. No committee transcripts were provided, and there is no indication of debate or division in the available record.
Contention
There is no notable contention reflected in the bill text or voting record. Because the resolution concerns a single board reappointment and the Senate vote was unanimous, any potential concerns would likely have centered only on the nominee’s qualifications under KRS 164.131 or the governor’s appointment authority, but no such objections appear in the available materials.