A RESOLUTION adjourning the Senate in honor and loving memory of Denise Lane "Deni" Hamilton.
Summary
SR155 is a Senate resolution honoring the life and memory of Denise Lane "Deni" Hamilton. The resolution recounts her upbringing in a military family, her education, her marriage to William Hamilton, and her role as a mother, grandmother, and community presence in Georgetown, Kentucky. It highlights her reputation for hospitality, her support of children and families, and her long record of civic involvement and professional achievement.
The resolution also notes her 45-year career in real estate, including ownership of her own company, service on professional boards, appointment to the Kentucky Real Estate Commission, and recognition as Realtor of the Year in 2022. It further recognizes her service on the Georgetown Community Hospital Board of Trustees and her involvement in the Euko-En on the Elkhorn Japanese Friendship Garden and sister-city efforts with Tahara Cho, Japan. The measure concludes by expressing the Senate’s condolences and directing that the Senate adjourn in her honor.
Impact
SR155 does not amend, create, or repeal any Kentucky statutes. Its legal effect is ceremonial only: it authorizes the Senate to adjourn in honor of Denise Lane "Deni" Hamilton, records the chamber’s sympathy, and directs the Clerk to transmit a copy of the resolution to Senator Matt Nunn for delivery to the family. The bill affects no regulated parties or state programs and has no substantive policy impact beyond official recognition.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SR155 is uniformly positive and respectful. The resolution itself is written as a tribute, emphasizing Hamilton’s generosity, community service, professional accomplishments, and family devotion. The bill was adopted by voice vote, indicating broad, noncontroversial support and no recorded opposition.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in SR155 because it is a memorial and honorary resolution rather than a substantive bill. The available record shows no committee debate, no recorded votes against it, and no amendments or disputed provisions. Any discussion would likely have centered on honoring Hamilton’s life and contributions, not on legislative disagreement.