AN ACT relating to automated license plate readers.
Summary
HB 375 would prohibit any person, business, association, or government entity in Kentucky from using, deploying, or maintaining an automated license plate reader (ALPR) system. The bill defines an ALPR as a system of cameras and computer algorithms that converts license plate images into machine-readable data. It applies broadly to both private and public actors, including the Commonwealth and its agencies or political subdivisions.
The bill also creates criminal and civil penalties for violations. Operating an ALPR system would be a Class D felony and carry a $10,000 fine. In addition, anyone recorded by an ALPR system would have a private right of action to seek an injunction, actual and punitive damages, and potentially attorney’s fees and costs. Prevailing defendants could also recover fees in some cases.
Impact
HB 375 would significantly change Kentucky law by creating a new prohibition in KRS Chapter 189 against the use of ALPR technology statewide. It would expose violators to both criminal liability and civil litigation, and it would authorize affected individuals to sue for injunctive relief and damages. The bill would affect law enforcement agencies, local governments, private businesses, and any other entity that currently uses or might consider using license plate reader technology for security, traffic, parking, or investigative purposes.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate or recorded support/opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears strongly restrictive and likely reflects a privacy- or surveillance-related policy concern. The absence of discussion and votes means the overall sentiment cannot be reliably characterized beyond the bill’s clear anti-ALPR posture.
Contention
The central point of contention is likely the complete ban on ALPR systems, especially because it applies to both private and public users and makes violations a felony. Supporters of such a ban would likely emphasize privacy, data retention, and surveillance concerns, while opponents would likely argue that ALPRs are useful for law enforcement, stolen vehicle recovery, and security operations. The bill’s private right of action, punitive damages, and attorney’s fee provisions could also be controversial because they increase litigation risk and financial exposure for users of the technology.