Kentucky Senate Bill SJR84

Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Refer: 1/22/24

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION applying for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress.

Impact

The proposed amendments would have significant implications for the structure of federal power within the United States. By limiting federal influence and spending, supporters of SJR84 assert that it will restore autonomy to states and better align governance with the needs and rights of local populations. This aligns with a broader movement among certain state legislatures advocating for the use of Article V to curb federal overreach, which proponents believe has resulted in a growing national debt and inefficient federal mandates that impact state operations.

Summary

SJR84 is a joint resolution from the Commonwealth of Kentucky that seeks to apply for a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. This resolution aims to propose amendments that would impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for federal officials and Congress members. The resolution emphasizes the need for states to act as guardians of liberty, particularly in the context of what is perceived to be federal excess and infringement upon state authority.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SJR84 is generally supportive within the context of its adoption by certain segments of the Kentucky legislature, particularly among those who advocate for reduced federal government intervention. However, this sentiment is countered by concerns from critics who argue that convening such a convention may open the door to unintended consequences that could jeopardize existing rights and regulatory frameworks. Thus, while the bill garners support from local conservative factions, it raises alarm among those wary of potential changes to the Constitution that could emerge from the convention process.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SJR84 include criticisms about the risks associated with calling a convention for amendments. Opponents argue that it could lead to a 'runaway convention,' where more radical amendments could be proposed or adopted, unintentionally altering fundamental rights. Additionally, debates focus on the implications of limiting federal authority, which some believe could adversely affect social welfare programs, regulatory protections, and the balance of power that currently exists between state and federal entities.