Establishing a pump installation contractor license and requiring additional examination, qualification and record-keeping requirements for licensed pump installation contractor and water well contractors.
HB 2095 revises Kansas law governing water well contractors and creates a separate licensing framework for pump installation contractors. It authorizes the Department of Health and Environment to license, examine, renew, discipline, and regulate both types of contractors, and it allows licensing examinations to be taken online, in person, or in a combination of formats. The bill also adds experience and subject-matter qualifications for applicants, including specific familiarity with Kansas water law, drilling methods, pump systems, and related equipment.
The bill also expands record-keeping and reporting requirements. Water well contractors would have to submit more detailed well logs, including location data, construction details, pump information, and other information the secretary requires, and they must provide a water quality analysis from a Kansas-certified laboratory upon request within 60 days of completion unless extended. Pump installation contractors would be required to keep a record of each pump installed and submit it within 30 days, with specified installation details. The bill changes license terms so they run on a two-year cycle beginning July 1 of even-numbered years, and it directs that penalties collected under the act be deposited into the water program fund rather than the general fund.
In practical terms, HB 2095 would amend multiple sections of the Kansas Groundwater Exploration and Protection Act and related statutes to broaden oversight of well and pump work, strengthen documentation of groundwater-related activities, and increase the amount of information available to the state geological survey and the public. It also updates enforcement provisions, continuing to allow license revocation, civil penalties, and misdemeanor penalties for violations, while aligning the statutory scheme with the new pump installation contractor category.
The overall sentiment in the available context appears neutral to supportive. The bill was requested by a representative on behalf of the Kansas Groundwater Association, which suggests it was developed with industry input and aimed at modernizing licensing and reporting rules. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no evidence of recorded opposition or debate in the supplied materials.
The main points of contention, based on the bill text itself, would likely be the added regulatory burden on contractors, including new licensing qualifications, online examination requirements, expanded reporting deadlines, and more detailed water quality and installation records. Another possible issue is the shift of penalty revenue to the water program fund and the secretary’s broad discretion to require additional data, which could raise concerns among affected contractors about compliance costs and administrative oversight.
HB 2095 would amend Kansas statutes governing groundwater exploration and protection by creating a distinct pump installation contractor license, adding qualifications and examination requirements for both pump installation contractors and water well contractors, and expanding the Department of Health and Environment’s regulatory authority. It would also change license terms to a biennial cycle tied to even-numbered years, require more detailed well and pump records, mandate water quality analyses from Kansas-certified laboratories upon request, and direct penalty revenue into the water program fund instead of the general fund. The bill would affect licensed contractors, landowners using well services, the secretary of health and environment, and the state geological survey.
The available context suggests the bill is generally favorable and technical in nature, with no recorded votes or committee testimony indicating organized opposition. Its request by the Kansas Groundwater Association points to industry support for clarifying and modernizing licensing standards. Because no transcripts or vote history are provided, the record does not show any formal controversy beyond the policy tradeoffs inherent in increased regulation.
The likely areas of contention are the bill’s expanded compliance obligations for contractors, including a new license category, more detailed reporting, shorter submission deadlines, and additional qualification standards. Contractors may view the new pump installation license and record-keeping rules as burdensome, while regulators and groundwater advocates may see them as necessary for better oversight and data collection. The secretary’s authority to require additional information and the requirement that water quality analyses be performed by Kansas-certified laboratories could also be debated as to cost, feasibility, and administrative burden.