Indiana 2026 Regular Session

Indiana Senate Bill SB0058

Introduced
12/8/25  

Caption

A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning education.

Summary

SB 58 would require Indiana school corporations, charter schools, and state-accredited nonpublic elementary schools to include print handwriting, cursive handwriting, and spelling in their curricula. For school corporations, the bill amends the existing curriculum statute to expressly list print handwriting and cursive handwriting for elementary grades, and spelling for kindergarten through grade 6. It also adds a new section applying the same handwriting and spelling requirements to charter schools and state-accredited nonpublic elementary schools. The bill does not change the broader structure of required subjects in Indiana schools, but it does make handwriting and spelling mandatory components of language arts instruction for the covered schools. The bill’s effective date is July 1, 2026, and it would amend Indiana Code chapter 20-30-5 governing required curriculum. The existing statute’s other required studies, including mathematics, social studies, science, fine arts, and health education, remain in place. The bill’s impact is primarily on elementary curriculum planning and compliance for public school corporations, charter schools, and state-accredited nonpublic elementary schools. Schools would need to ensure these specific skills are taught as part of their language arts offerings, which could affect instructional time, materials, and teacher planning. Because the bill applies to charter and nonpublic elementary schools as well as traditional public schools, it broadens the reach of the mandate across multiple school types. There is no recorded committee testimony or vote history in the provided materials, so the overall sentiment cannot be measured from debate or roll calls. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears straightforward and prescriptive, with no explicit opposition or controversy documented in the available record. The absence of discussion suggests either limited public controversy so far or that the bill was still in the early stages of consideration. The main point of potential contention is whether the state should mandate specific elementary skills such as cursive handwriting and spelling rather than leaving those decisions to local schools. Supporters would likely view the bill as reinforcing foundational literacy and penmanship skills, while critics might argue it adds a state requirement that could reduce local flexibility or crowd out other instructional priorities.

Impact

SB 58 would amend Indiana’s required curriculum law in IC 20-30-5 to add explicit handwriting and spelling requirements for elementary education. It would require school corporations, charter schools, and state-accredited nonpublic elementary schools to include print handwriting, cursive handwriting, and spelling in specified grade levels, thereby creating a statewide instructional mandate for these subjects. The bill would not repeal existing curriculum requirements, but it would expand the list of required language arts studies and apply the mandate across public, charter, and qualifying nonpublic elementary schools.

Sentiment

No committee transcript or vote data was provided, so there is no documented floor or committee sentiment to summarize. From the bill text, the measure appears to be a relatively noncontroversial education standards bill focused on basic literacy skills, but the available record does not show whether lawmakers or stakeholders supported or opposed it. The lack of recorded debate suggests sentiment is either not yet developed or not captured in the materials provided.

Contention

The likely point of contention is the state’s decision to require cursive handwriting and spelling instruction by statute, rather than allowing local school boards and charter operators to decide curriculum priorities. Supporters may argue that handwriting and spelling are foundational skills worth preserving, especially in elementary grades. Opponents, if any, would likely focus on curriculum flexibility, instructional time, and whether the state should mandate specific teaching methods or content for charter and nonpublic schools.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

IN HB1283

U.S.S. Indianapolis CA-35 Day.

IN SB0035

School curriculum.

IN SB0277

Indiana grown produce for students program.

IN HB1095

Indiana crime guns task force.

IN HB1008

Indiana-Illinois boundary adjustment commission.

IN HB1515

Education and higher education matters.

IN HB1337

Time observance in Indiana.

IN HB1271

Indiana welcome signs.

IN SB0347

Indiana economic development corporation.

IN HB1383

Indiana civilian cyber corps.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.