Urging the Governor to recognize the SOS Hand Signal.
Summary
This concurrent resolution urges the Governor of Indiana to recognize the SOS Hand Signal as an additional way for people to seek emergency assistance. The resolution explains that the hand signal is a nationally recognized silent distress signal used when a person cannot safely speak, call, or text for help. It frames the signal as especially important for victims of human trafficking and others who may be unable to access 911 directly.
The resolution also emphasizes public awareness and education, noting that Indiana students already learn about calling 911 and could benefit from learning the SOS Hand Signal as well. It does not create a new criminal penalty, reporting requirement, or enforcement mechanism; instead, it is a formal legislative request that the Governor recognize the signal and that the Secretary of the Senate transmit the resolution to Governor Mike Braun.
Impact
SCR0035 would not amend the Indiana Code or create binding law. Its practical effect would be advisory and educational: it encourages state recognition of the SOS Hand Signal as a tool for obtaining emergency assistance and could support broader public messaging, school instruction, and awareness efforts around silent distress signals, human trafficking response, and emergency communication.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment appears supportive and noncontroversial. The resolution is framed around protecting vulnerable people, especially trafficking victims and others unable to speak openly, and it presents the SOS Hand Signal as a simple, existing safety tool. No committee debate or recorded votes are provided, so there is no evidence of formal opposition in the available materials.
Contention
The main substantive issue is not whether the signal is useful, but whether state recognition should be elevated through a concurrent resolution rather than left to agencies, schools, or public safety partners. Any potential concern would likely center on implementation—how widely the signal should be promoted, whether schools or law enforcement should adopt it formally, and whether public recognition could create confusion if people assume it has legal force beyond being an emergency aid signal. No specific opposition is documented in the provided record.