Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB2314

Introduced
2/7/25  
Refer
2/7/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Engrossed
4/3/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Refer
4/17/25  
Report Pass
5/6/25  
Enrolled
5/22/25  
Chaptered
8/1/25  

Caption

SHORELINE RESTORATION FUNDING

Summary

SB2314 amends the Healthy Forests, Wetlands, and Prairies Act to expand and clarify the state grant program administered by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The program is intended to restore degraded forest lands and native prairies, promote native vegetation, and support projects that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and help mitigate climate change. The bill also broadens the list of eligible applicants to include state agencies, local governments, conservation land trusts, certain nonprofit conservation organizations, and other entities the Department deems eligible. The bill specifies how grant funds may be used, including matching federal or private dollars, planting and maintaining native grasses, plants, and trees, restoring urban forests and natural lands, removing invasive species, funding regional planting and prescribed burning teams, and supporting education and outreach. It also adds shoreline restoration and protection projects on behalf of counties and park districts as an eligible use. The Department is directed to adopt rules for implementation, and the bill sets funding limits, including at least 75% of appropriated funds going to eligible project recipients, up to 23% for restoration and climate-mitigation activities, and up to 2% for administrative costs. The bill’s impact on state law is to revise Section 20 of the Healthy Forests, Wetlands, and Prairies Act, strengthening the statutory framework for conservation grants and explicitly tying the program to climate mitigation and shoreline protection. It gives the Department of Natural Resources broader discretion over eligible recipients and project selection while preserving appropriation-based funding. Counties, park districts, municipalities, forest preserves, land trusts, nonprofits, and other conservation-focused entities are among the parties most directly affected. The general sentiment around the bill appears strongly favorable. It passed the Senate 53-1 and the House 103-11, indicating broad bipartisan support for conservation funding, habitat restoration, and shoreline protection. The bill’s framing around climate mitigation, native habitat restoration, and local environmental projects likely contributed to its positive reception. No committee transcript was provided, so specific objections are not documented in the available materials. The limited opposition reflected in the votes suggests any contention was modest and may have centered on the scope of climate-related spending, the Department’s discretion in determining eligible recipients, or the allocation of grant funds among project types. However, the recorded votes show that these concerns did not prevent overwhelming passage.

Impact

SB2314 amends the Healthy Forests, Wetlands, and Prairies Act to expand the Healthy Forests, Wetlands, and Prairies Grant Program, add shoreline restoration and protection as an eligible project type, and clarify funding limits and eligible recipients. It affects the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, local governments, conservation land trusts, nonprofits, counties, park districts, forest preserves, and other conservation entities by authorizing them to seek and receive grants for habitat restoration, invasive species removal, native planting, prescribed burning, education, and related climate-mitigation work.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have enjoyed broad support in both chambers, passing the Senate 53-1 and the House 103-11. The vote totals suggest a generally positive view of the measure as a conservation and environmental restoration initiative, with bipartisan acceptance of the grant program expansion and shoreline funding provisions.

Contention

No committee discussion transcript is available, so there is no direct record of debated issues. Based on the small number of dissenting votes, any contention likely involved the bill’s climate-change emphasis, the Department of Natural Resources’ discretion in selecting eligible recipients, or the use of state grant funds for shoreline restoration and related projects. Even so, opposition was limited and did not materially slow passage.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.