Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1861

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  

Caption

PROCUREMENT-NEW SALEM

Summary

SB1861 amends the Illinois Procurement Code to add a specific exemption for procurements made in connection with Lincoln’s New Salem State Historic Site. In practical terms, the bill would remove those site-related purchases and contracts from the normal state procurement rules that generally govern competitive bidding, contract procedures, and related oversight requirements under the Code. The bill is narrow in scope and does not create a new program or funding source. Instead, it carves out one historic site from the Procurement Code’s coverage by adding Lincoln’s New Salem to the list of exemptions in Section 1-10. The effect is to give the responsible state entities more flexibility in obtaining goods and services for the site without following the full procurement process that applies to most state contracts.

Impact

If enacted, SB1861 would amend 30 ILCS 500/1-10 of the Illinois Procurement Code to exclude procurements connected to Lincoln’s New Salem State Historic Site from the Code’s requirements. That means contracts and purchases for the site would no longer be subject to the standard procurement procedures, though other general legal and oversight obligations outside the Code could still apply. The bill would affect state agencies or entities handling site operations, maintenance, programming, or related services for the historic site.

Sentiment

There is little recorded debate, vote history, or committee testimony available for this bill, so the overall sentiment cannot be measured from discussion records. Based on the bill’s limited and site-specific nature, it appears to be a targeted administrative measure rather than a controversial policy change. The caption and text suggest a straightforward effort to streamline procurement for a historic preservation or tourism-related site.

Contention

No committee transcripts or votes are provided, so no specific objections or supporters are documented in the available record. The main potential point of contention would be the policy choice to exempt a state historic site from the Procurement Code, which could raise questions about transparency, competition, and oversight in contracting. Supporters would likely emphasize operational flexibility and efficiency for Lincoln’s New Salem, while any critics would likely focus on the loss of standard procurement safeguards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.