Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB0291

Introduced
1/24/25  
Refer
1/24/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/26/25  
Engrossed
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Refer
4/17/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Enrolled
5/21/25  
Chaptered
8/1/25  

Caption

ONE HEALTH TASK FORCE

Summary

SB0291 creates the Illinois One Health Commission within the Department of Public Health. The bill is based on the “One Health” concept, which treats human health, animal health, plant health, and environmental health as interconnected. Its stated purpose is to improve coordination across state agencies, universities, health professionals, veterinarians, and other experts to better address zoonotic disease, emerging infectious threats, antimicrobial resistance, and related public health and environmental challenges. The Commission is directed to develop a strategic plan, recommend best practices, create mechanisms to support state and local responses to zoonotic outbreaks, promote education and outreach, and encourage surveillance and science-based approaches, including xenosurveillance and judicious antibiotic use. It must also partner with academic and nonprofit entities, meet as needed, serve without compensation, and submit a final report to the General Assembly and Governor by January 1, 2028, with updates every two years thereafter. The report must assess One Health surveillance and response systems and recommend future legislative or regulatory action. The bill would add a new statutory framework in Illinois law establishing a formal interagency commission and defining “One Health” for state purposes. It assigns administrative support to the Department of Public Health and the University of Illinois and includes a broad membership from public health, agriculture, environmental protection, emergency management, housing, transportation, commerce, academia, medicine, veterinary medicine, and safety-net health care. Although it does not directly regulate private conduct, it creates a state advisory and coordination body that could influence future policy, agency practice, and public health planning. The overall sentiment appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. The bill passed the Senate 55-0 and the House 104-0, indicating unanimous support in both chambers. No committee transcript or recorded opposition is provided, and the vote totals suggest broad bipartisan agreement around the value of cross-sector coordination on disease prevention and environmental health. The main policy emphasis is on collaboration rather than regulation, so any contention would likely center on the scope of the commission, the breadth of participating agencies, or whether the state should devote resources to a new advisory structure. However, the available record shows no active dispute. The bill’s supporters appear to view it as a proactive public health and preparedness measure, while any concerns about administrative burden or overlap with existing agencies are not reflected in the voting history.

Impact

SB0291 adds a new part to Illinois law establishing the One Health Commission in the Department of Public Health and setting out its powers, membership, reporting duties, and administrative support. It creates a formal state mechanism for interagency coordination on human, animal, and environmental health issues, but it does not create new penalties or direct regulatory requirements for the public. The bill may influence future agency actions, recommendations, and legislation by producing reports and policy proposals on zoonotic disease surveillance, outbreak response, and related health strategies.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have enjoyed very strong support. It passed the Illinois Senate 55-0 and the House 104-0, with no recorded dissent in either chamber. The absence of committee transcript material or documented opposition suggests the measure was viewed as a broadly acceptable public health and coordination initiative.

Contention

No significant contention is evident in the available record. The bill’s structure is advisory and collaborative, which likely reduced controversy. If any concerns existed, they would most likely involve the size and composition of the commission, the inclusion of multiple state agencies and outside experts, or the potential for overlap with existing public health and agricultural functions, but none of those issues appear in the voting history provided.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.