Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB0077

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/13/25  
Refer
1/22/25  

Caption

LIBRARIES-BIDDING THRESHOLD

Summary

SB0077 would amend two Illinois library statutes—the Illinois Local Library Act and the Public Library District Act of 1991—to raise the dollar threshold that triggers competitive bidding for certain library construction, remodeling, repair, improvement, and equipment-purchase contracts. Under current law, libraries must advertise for bids and award to the lowest responsible bidder when the cost exceeds $25,000; this bill increases that threshold to $35,000. The bill applies to both local library boards and public library district trustees. The measure preserves the existing framework for competitive bidding, including the requirement to use the lowest responsible bidder and the list of contracts exempt from bidding, such as professional services, utility services, certain technology purchases, intergovernmental procurements, and emergency expenditures approved by a supermajority of the board. It also takes effect immediately if enacted.

Impact

If enacted, SB0077 would change the procurement rules governing Illinois public libraries by allowing more contracts to be awarded without formal competitive bidding when the cost is $35,000 or less, rather than $25,000 or less. This would affect library boards and trustees making capital improvements, equipment purchases, and related procurement decisions, while leaving the existing exemptions and bidder-responsibility standards in place. The bill would amend Section 5-5 of the Illinois Local Library Act and Section 40-45 of the Public Library District Act of 1991.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears administrative and narrowly focused on procurement thresholds rather than policy change, suggesting it may be viewed as a technical adjustment to reflect inflation or current purchasing conditions. The absence of recorded opposition or amendments in the provided context means sentiment cannot be assessed beyond that neutral characterization.

Contention

The main potential point of contention is the higher bidding threshold itself: supporters may view it as reducing administrative burden and giving libraries more flexibility for routine purchases, while critics may worry it reduces transparency or competitive pressure for contracts between $25,000 and $35,000. Another possible issue is whether the increase is large enough to meaningfully modernize procurement rules or whether it could weaken safeguards without sufficient justification. No specific individuals or groups are identified in the provided record as taking either side.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

IL HB1592

LIBRARIES-BIDDING THRESHOLD

IL HB4261

LIBRARIES-GRANTS

IL HB0042

LIBRARIES-NONRESIDENTS-FEES

IL SB2903

CIVIC CENTER-BIDDING THRESHOLD

IL HB4647

CIVIC CENTER-BIDDING THRESHOLD

IL HB2352

GOVT ACCOUNT AUDIT THRESHOLD

IL SB1408

GOVT ACCOUNT AUDIT THRESHOLD

IL HB1910

LIBRARIES-OPIOID ANTAGONISTS

IL SB216

Local government competitive bidding thresholds. (FE)

IL AB217

Local government competitive bidding thresholds. (FE)

Similar Bills

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2445

task order contracts; website; posting

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

NJ S3306

Requires notification to members of health club if club is to be sold and health club services contract assigned to new owner.