SB0022 amends the Illinois Motor Fuel Tax Law to remove the statutory category of “supplier” and repeal several provisions tied to that classification. It also repeals the prohibition on anyone other than a licensed distributor acting as a supplier of special fuel in Illinois, while revising the definitions of “distributor” and “receiver” to reflect the new structure. The bill makes conforming changes throughout the Motor Fuel Tax Law, including provisions on monthly returns, tax collection, recordkeeping, inspections, penalties, refunds, and license revocation.
Substantively, the bill preserves the state’s motor fuel tax framework but reorganizes who is regulated under it and how certain transactions are reported. It continues to require distributors to collect and remit tax, maintain records, and comply with Department of Revenue inspections, while updating references that currently include suppliers. It also keeps existing rules on dyed diesel fuel, tax-free sales, refunds, and International Fuel Tax Agreement administration, but aligns those provisions with the revised licensing categories.
Impact
The bill would amend multiple sections of the Motor Fuel Tax Law, primarily by deleting references to “supplier” and repealing related sections that impose licensing, bonding, reporting, and operational requirements on suppliers. It would also change the legal definitions of “distributor” and “receiver,” which would affect who is subject to tax collection, filing, inspection, penalty, and enforcement provisions under the Act. In practice, the Department of Revenue and affected fuel businesses would need to adjust compliance, licensing, and reporting practices to match the revised terminology and regulatory structure.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears technical and administrative rather than policy-expansive, suggesting it is aimed at simplifying or modernizing fuel-tax terminology and compliance rules. The absence of recorded discussion makes the overall sentiment difficult to gauge beyond that neutral, housekeeping-oriented impression.
Contention
The main point of contention likely concerns the elimination of the “supplier” category and the repeal of provisions that specifically regulate suppliers of special fuel. Those changes could affect businesses that currently operate under that designation, as well as the Department of Revenue’s enforcement and licensing framework. Another likely issue is whether the revised definitions of “distributor” and “receiver” adequately preserve tax compliance and anti-evasion safeguards while reducing unnecessary regulatory overlap. No explicit objections or supporters are documented in the provided materials.