HJRCA0012 proposes a constitutional amendment to overhaul how Illinois legislative and representative districts are drawn. It would require districts to preserve political subdivisions and communities of interest, and it would bar district lines from crossing county, village, city, town, or township boundaries. The measure also adds a compactness requirement and directs map-drawing bodies to avoid splitting neighborhoods or other communities with shared interests.
The amendment would shift redistricting authority away from the General Assembly to an Apportionment Commission. The text describes a commission made up of county-based appointees, with fallback procedures if a plan is not adopted on time, including involvement by the Supreme Court and a random selection process to add a member. It also gives the Illinois Supreme Court original and exclusive jurisdiction over redistricting challenges and provides that an approved plan would have the force of law once filed with the Secretary of State.
Impact
If adopted, the proposal would amend Article IV, Section 3 of the Illinois Constitution and substantially change the state’s redistricting framework. It would replace the legislature’s role in drawing House and Senate districts with a commission-based process, impose stricter geographic and community-preservation rules, and prohibit use of partisan data, election results, voting history, party registration, socioeconomic data, and incumbent residence information when drawing districts. The amendment would also affect local government voting districts by extending similar restrictions to other public bodies that set district boundaries.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears to be framed as a reform effort aimed at reducing partisan influence and improving geographic coherence in districting. The caption and provisions suggest support for independent or nonpartisan redistricting principles, but there is no committee transcript or recorded vote history provided to show broader legislative sentiment. As a result, the available record does not indicate whether the proposal has attracted formal support or opposition in committee or on the floor.
Contention
The main points of contention are likely to be the transfer of redistricting power away from the General Assembly, the design and composition of the proposed commission, and the ban on using partisan and socioeconomic data. Supporters would likely emphasize anti-gerrymandering, compact districts, and protection of communities of interest, while opponents may object that the commission structure is complex, that county-based appointments could create administrative or political issues, and that the restrictions could limit practical map-drawing considerations. The proposal’s application to local government voting districts may also be controversial because it extends beyond state legislative maps.
A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-69.6 and 16.1-69.6:1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to twenty-seventh judicial district; boundary of judicial district; number of judges.
Relating to a reduction in the maximum compressed tax rate of a school district and additional state aid for certain school districts impacted by compression.
Proposes an amendment to Constitution specifying a method of providing for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of free public schools and allocating all income tax receipts to school districts.