Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB4523

Introduced
1/21/26  
Refer
1/30/26  
Refer
2/11/26  

Caption

PFAS-CONTAINING PESTICIDES

Summary

HB4523 is titled "PFAS-CONTAINING PESTICIDES," indicating it addresses pesticides that contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Based on the bill caption and available context, the measure appears aimed at regulating, restricting, or otherwise addressing the use, sale, or distribution of pesticides with PFAS components in Illinois. Because the full operative text is not included in the provided material, the specific statutory changes cannot be identified with certainty. However, a bill of this type would likely affect state pesticide law and any related environmental or public health provisions by creating new limits, disclosure requirements, enforcement authority, or product standards for PFAS-containing pesticide products.

Impact

HB4523 would likely amend Illinois statutes governing pesticides and potentially related environmental or consumer-protection provisions by adding rules specific to PFAS-containing pesticide products. Its practical effect would be on pesticide manufacturers, distributors, applicators, retailers, and state regulators responsible for pesticide oversight, with possible downstream implications for agricultural users and environmental compliance.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the available record. The bill caption suggests an environmental and public-health focus, which often draws support from advocates concerned about chemical exposure and contamination, while potentially raising concerns from agricultural and pesticide industry stakeholders about product availability, compliance costs, and regulatory burden.

Contention

The main likely point of contention is whether PFAS-containing pesticides should be restricted or regulated more tightly, and if so, how broadly. Environmental and public-health advocates would likely favor stronger limits due to concerns about persistent chemical contamination, while agricultural interests, pesticide manufacturers, and applicators may argue that such restrictions could reduce pest-control options, increase costs, or create implementation challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.