HB3318 amends the Illinois Barber, Cosmetology, Esthetics, Hair Braiding, and Nail Technology Act of 1985 to expressly include the use of hydrodermabrasion devices, such as Hydrafacial machines, within the statutory definitions of both cosmetology and esthetics when those devices are used for cosmetic or beautifying purposes rather than for treating disease or a muscular or nervous disorder. The bill makes this clarification in both the cosmetology and esthetics sections of the Act.
The practical effect is to bring hydrodermabrasion services under the licensing and regulatory framework that already governs cosmetologists and estheticians in Illinois. As a result, providers offering these services would be subject to the same professional scope-of-practice rules, licensing requirements, and enforcement provisions that apply to other cosmetic skin-care and beautification services under the Act. The bill is effective immediately if enacted.
Impact
HB3318 would amend Sections 3-1 and 3A-1 of the Barber, Cosmetology, Esthetics, Hair Braiding, and Nail Technology Act of 1985 to specifically name hydrodermabrasion devices as covered cosmetic services. This would affect licensed cosmetologists and estheticians, as well as salons, spas, and other providers offering Hydrafacial-type treatments, by clarifying that these services fall within regulated practice areas rather than outside the Act. The bill does not appear to create a new licensing category, but instead expands or clarifies the scope of existing cosmetology and esthetics definitions.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee testimony or votes, the overall sentiment appears neutral to supportive, with the measure presented as a technical clarification of professional scope rather than a controversial policy change. The caption and synopsis suggest the bill is intended to resolve uncertainty around a specific cosmetic service and align it with existing regulatory definitions. No recorded opposition, amendments, or divided vote history is available in the provided materials.
Contention
The main point of potential contention is whether hydrodermabrasion should be treated as a standard cosmetic/esthetic service subject to cosmetology licensing rules or whether it should be treated differently because of its device-based nature. Providers, salons, or device users who believe the service should remain outside the Act could view the bill as expanding regulation, while licensed cosmetologists and estheticians may support the clarification because it confirms the service falls within their scope of practice. No specific stakeholder positions or committee objections are included in the available record.
Occupations: cosmetologists; cut and color license option; provide for. Amends secs. 1201 & 1203a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.1201 & 339.1203a) & adds sec. 1207a.
Occupations: cosmetologists; shampoo services performed in a cosmetology establishment by certain cosmetology apprentices; allow. Amends sec. 1203a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.1203a).