HB3302 amends the Illinois Electric Vehicle Rebate Act to expand and adjust the state’s electric vehicle rebate program. The bill would authorize rebates for electric motorcycles, in addition to other electric vehicles, and it would change the application deadline from 90 days to 180 days after purchase. It also requires applicants to apply during an open rebate cycle identified by the Environmental Protection Agency and to certify that they qualify as low-income.
The bill retains the program’s focus on low-income purchasers and Illinois residents, while clarifying that rebates are available for both new and used electric vehicles and that eligibility is limited to vehicles purchased in Illinois. It also updates definitions and makes technical changes to the rebate structure and administration, with an effective date of July 1, 2025.
Impact
HB3302 would amend Sections 10, 27, and 40 of the Electric Vehicle Rebate Act, changing who can receive rebates and how the program is administered. It would expand eligible vehicles to include electric motorcycles, extend the filing window for rebate applications, and require applicants to certify low-income status. The bill also broadens the funding language so that money deposited into the Electric Vehicle Rebate Fund from the General Revenue Fund or any other fund may be used for the rebate program, rather than limiting that language to General Revenue Fund deposits only.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition from legislative debate. Based on the bill text, the measure appears to be framed as a targeted expansion and administrative adjustment to an existing rebate program, with a clear emphasis on low-income access and program usability. The absence of recorded controversy suggests the bill was at least introduced as a policy refinement rather than a major overhaul.
Contention
The main policy questions raised by the bill are likely to be the expansion of rebates to electric motorcycles, the requirement that applicants certify low-income status, and the use of broader funding sources for the rebate fund. Potential supporters would include clean transportation advocates, low-income consumer advocates, and electric vehicle industry interests, while possible concerns could come from fiscal watchdogs, administrators worried about program complexity, or those questioning whether motorcycle rebates should be prioritized. Because no discussion or vote history is available, specific objections cannot be attributed to any legislator or stakeholder.
Relating to court administration, including the term of a local administrative judge, court administration training, and the compensation of certain administrative judges.