Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3166

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Refer
3/21/25  
Refer
2/24/26  

Caption

IDOT-INTERCITY BUS PROGRAM

Summary

HB3166 would require the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) to create an intercity bus program aimed at expanding statewide travel options without driving. The program is intended to complement existing rail service by adding bus frequencies where rail service is limited, providing frequent departures throughout the day ahead of Amtrak service, and extending the network to smaller towns that may not currently be well served by passenger rail. The bill also requires bus schedules to be coordinated with intercity and commuter trains so riders can make convenient transfers. It further directs that passengers be able to buy a single ticket for combined bus-and-train trips, while also allowing bus-only tickets to be sold through the same ticketing system used for intercity trains. IDOT could implement the program through competitive-bid contracts with bus carriers, through Amtrak’s Thruway bus program, or by contracting with a local transit authority in Illinois.

Impact

The bill would add a new Section 2705-442 to the Department of Transportation Law in the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois, creating an express statutory mandate for IDOT to plan and implement an intercity bus network. It would expand the department’s transportation responsibilities beyond rail and highway oversight to include coordinated bus-rail service planning, integrated ticketing, and potential contracting arrangements with private carriers, Amtrak, or local transit agencies. The practical effect would be to formalize and potentially expand intercity mobility options for riders in underserved areas and along rail corridors.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the limited available context, the measure appears generally positive and policy-oriented, with an emphasis on affordability, connectivity, and access to travel across the state. There is no recorded committee debate or vote history in the provided materials, so no formal support or opposition can be identified from legislative proceedings. The bill’s framing suggests it is intended as a transportation service expansion rather than a controversial regulatory change.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided transcripts or voting history. Potential areas of debate, if the bill advances, could include the cost of establishing and operating the program, whether IDOT should directly manage service or rely on contractors, how the program would interact with Amtrak and local transit providers, and whether the state should prioritize bus expansion over other transportation investments. However, these concerns are not explicitly raised in the available record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.