Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3124

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
3/4/25  

Caption

RESHORE OUR SUPPLY CHAINS

Summary

HB3124 amends the Illinois Income Tax Act and would allow taxpayers to claim a depreciation deduction for federal income tax purposes in computing Illinois base income. The bill is framed as the “Reshore Our Supply Chains Tax Reform Act,” suggesting an economic-development purpose tied to encouraging investment and domestic production. In practical terms, the measure would change how Illinois conforms to federal depreciation rules by permitting a subtraction tied to federal depreciation deductions, including bonus depreciation, for eligible property. The bill’s text is largely a technical amendment to Section 203 of the Illinois Income Tax Act, which defines base income for individuals, corporations, trusts, estates, and partnerships. It would affect the calculation of Illinois taxable income by adding or adjusting depreciation-related subtraction provisions, and it appears to be designed to align or modify Illinois treatment of federal depreciation deductions. Because the bill amends a core income tax computation section, it would affect a broad range of taxpayers, especially businesses making capital investments in equipment or other depreciable property. The general sentiment in the available record is neutral to mildly supportive in concept, but there is very limited evidence of debate because there are no committee transcripts and no recorded votes in the materials provided. The bill’s title and framing indicate an intent to promote supply-chain reshoring and investment, which typically appeals to business and economic-development interests. However, without hearing records or vote history, there is no documented public opposition or endorsement in the provided context. Notable points of contention are not captured in the available materials, but the bill’s likely policy tradeoff is between tax relief for investment and the resulting reduction in state revenue. Any concern would likely center on the fiscal impact of allowing an additional depreciation deduction and whether the change would primarily benefit businesses with significant capital expenditures. The bill also appears to interact with existing Illinois add-back and subtraction rules for bonus depreciation, so technical conformity issues may be a point of scrutiny for tax administrators and practitioners.

Impact

HB3124 would amend Section 203 of the Illinois Income Tax Act, which governs the calculation of base income for individuals, corporations, trusts, estates, and partnerships. The bill would alter Illinois tax treatment of depreciation by allowing a taxpayer to claim a depreciation deduction for federal income tax purposes, affecting how federal depreciation flows into Illinois taxable income. Because Section 203 is the core base-income provision, the change would have statewide application across multiple taxpayer classes and could reduce Illinois income tax liability for taxpayers with depreciable assets.

Sentiment

The available record shows no committee transcript and no voting history, so there is no documented floor or committee sentiment to measure directly. Based on the bill text and title, the measure appears intended as a pro-investment, pro-manufacturing tax reform proposal aimed at reshoring supply chains, which suggests a generally favorable policy orientation among supporters of business tax relief. At the same time, the absence of recorded debate means there is no evidence in the provided materials of organized support or opposition.

Contention

No explicit points of contention are documented in the provided transcripts or votes because none are available. Based on the substance of the bill, the most likely areas of dispute would be the revenue cost to the state, the extent to which the deduction would benefit in-state investment versus broader corporate tax planning, and whether the change creates additional complexity in Illinois conformity with federal depreciation rules. Tax policy stakeholders, fiscal watchdogs, and business advocates would be the most likely groups to disagree over those issues.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.