HB3030 creates the Removal of Unlawful Publications of Obscene and Harmful Depictions On Social Media Platforms Act. The bill requires social media platforms to promptly investigate reports that an obscene depiction or otherwise harmful depiction by computer has been unlawfully posted, and if the report is deemed credible, remove the image within 24 hours. It also requires the platform to forward the report and identifying information about the publisher to the Illinois Attorney General.
The bill defines key terms such as “social media platform,” “depiction by computer,” “harm,” and “obscene depiction.” It applies to public or semi-public internet services with Illinois users that allow user profiles, social connections, and user-generated content. The measure is effective immediately and is framed as a new state law governing online content moderation and enforcement related to obscene or harmful visual material.
Impact
If enacted, HB3030 would add a new Illinois statutory framework regulating how social media companies handle reports of unlawful obscene or harmful visual depictions. It would impose a 24-hour removal obligation after a credible report, require disclosure of identifying information to the Attorney General, and authorize state enforcement actions seeking injunctions, restitution, disgorgement, damages, civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation, and other relief. The bill would directly affect social media platforms operating in Illinois and individuals who publish the covered content, including those located outside the state.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears to be driven by concern over online abuse and harmful image-based content, with a strong enforcement-oriented approach. No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no documented legislative debate or voting pattern to gauge broader support or opposition. The bill’s introduction suggests an intent to respond quickly to harmful online publications and to give state authorities a significant role in enforcement.
Contention
The main points of contention likely involve the scope of the definitions, the 24-hour takedown requirement, and the obligation to provide publisher-identifying information to the Attorney General. Social media platforms may view the bill as imposing significant compliance burdens and potential liability, while supporters would likely emphasize rapid removal of harmful content and stronger remedies for victims. The breadth of terms such as “harmful depiction” and the inclusion of emotional distress, reputational injury, and economic harm could also raise concerns about overbreadth, due process, and free-speech implications.