Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2938

Introduced
2/5/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Refer
3/4/25  

Caption

$IDOT-PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE

Summary

HB2938 is an Illinois appropriations bill that would allocate $90 million from the General Revenue Fund to the Illinois Department of Transportation for passenger rail service projects. The bill divides the funding into nine $10 million appropriations for specific corridors and services, including Chicago-to-Milwaukee, Chicago-to-Madison, Chicago-to-Rockford, Chicago-to-Moline, Chicago-to-Galesburg-to-Quincy, Chicago-to-Peoria, Chicago-to-East St. Louis, Chicago-to-Carbondale, and a high-speed line capable of 180 miles per hour. The measure is narrowly focused on transportation funding and does not amend substantive regulatory law; instead, it authorizes state spending for rail planning, development, or support through IDOT. If enacted, it would direct state resources toward expanding or improving intercity passenger rail options across Illinois and into neighboring Wisconsin, potentially supporting infrastructure development, service expansion, and long-term rail corridor planning.

Impact

HB2938 would change state fiscal law by appropriating $90 million from the General Revenue Fund to IDOT for designated passenger rail services. It would not create new criminal, civil, or regulatory provisions, but it would authorize state spending for multiple rail corridors and a high-speed rail line, affecting IDOT, rail planners, and communities along the listed routes.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears to reflect a pro-rail, infrastructure-investment approach, with a clear emphasis on expanding passenger rail service across multiple regions of the state.

Contention

Because there are no transcripts or votes, specific points of contention are not documented in the available record. Potential areas of disagreement, based on the bill’s structure, could include the size of the appropriation, the distribution of funds among corridors, the inclusion of interstate routes such as Chicago-Milwaukee and Chicago-Madison, and the feasibility or priority of a 180 mph high-speed line.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.