HB2761 amends the Illinois Sports Wagering Act to create a pathway for a professional sports team to obtain a master sports wagering license when the public entity that owns the sports facility does not seek one. To qualify, the team must play the majority of its home games at the facility and have written authorization from the public entity. The bill treats the team as a sports facility for purposes of the Act and requires the team to operate through a designated third party (a designee) that is treated as the facility owner under the law.
The bill also sets the licensing terms for this team-based master sports wagering license. The initial fee is $1 million, but after 12 months of sportsbook operations the fee is recalculated to equal 5% of the licensee’s handle from that first year. The license would be valid for four years, and the Illinois Gaming Board is authorized to adopt rules to implement the new provisions.
Impact
HB2761 would expand the class of entities eligible to hold a master sports wagering license under Illinois law by allowing certain professional sports teams to step into the role otherwise reserved for the public owner of a sports facility. It would amend the Sports Wagering Act by adding a new Section 25-47 and would affect licensing, fee calculation, and regulatory oversight by the Illinois Gaming Board. The bill could change how sportsbook partnerships are structured for stadiums and teams, especially where a public owner declines to apply for a license.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee discussion or votes, the available context suggests a neutral-to-supportive policy approach focused on expanding licensing flexibility rather than imposing new restrictions. The measure appears designed to provide an alternative licensing route for professional teams and to clarify how sports wagering operations can proceed when a public facility owner is not the applicant. No formal opposition, amendments, or recorded vote history is provided in the materials.
Contention
The main potential point of contention is the shift in licensing authority from a public entity that owns the sports facility to a private professional sports team, even though the team must have written authorization from the public owner. Another possible issue is the fee structure, which starts at $1 million but later converts to a percentage of handle, raising questions about revenue predictability and fairness. Stakeholders most likely to care include public facility owners, professional sports teams, sportsbook operators, and the Illinois Gaming Board, which would need to implement and regulate the new licensing framework.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.
Occupations: individual licensing and registration; licensure of professional guardians and conservators; require. Amends sec. 303a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.303a) & adds art. 14A.