States findings of the House of Representatives and provides that all temporary and pending rules of the Idaho Department of Labor, the Industrial Commission, and the Division of Veterans Services have been reviewed and approved by the Senate State Affairs Committee, with an exception.
House Resolution 13 is a legislative findings resolution concerning administrative rules reviewed during the 2025 session. It states that the House Commerce and Human Resources Committee reviewed temporary and pending rules from the Idaho Department of Labor, the Industrial Commission, and the Division of Veterans Services, and that those rules were approved with one specific exception. The resolution is based on Idaho Code section 67-5291, which requires standing committees to review germane temporary or pending rules published in the Idaho Administrative Bulletin.
The resolution identifies the exception as IDAPA 17.01.01, Industrial Commission, Administrative Rules Under the Worker’s Compensation Law, Docket No. 17-0101-2301, Section 305, Subsection 01.a., which was not approved. In practical terms, the measure does not itself create new regulatory policy; instead, it records the House’s review and approval action on agency rules and signals legislative acceptance of most of the reviewed administrative rule package, while preserving a single disapproval.
Its impact on state law is limited to the legislative oversight process for administrative rules. By adopting the resolution, the House formally acknowledges compliance with the statutory review requirement and confirms which temporary and pending rules may proceed, except for the specified workers’ compensation provision. The affected entities are the Idaho Department of Labor, the Industrial Commission, the Division of Veterans Services, and, indirectly, employers, employees, veterans, and workers’ compensation stakeholders subject to those rules.
The general sentiment appears procedural and largely favorable, with the committee approving the vast majority of the rules under review. The only notable point of contention is the single workers’ compensation subsection that was not approved, suggesting concern about that particular administrative provision rather than the broader rule set. No vote totals or transcript discussion were provided, so the available record indicates routine oversight with one targeted objection rather than broad opposition.
Keywords: Idaho administrative rules, legislative review, temporary rules, pending rules, Idaho Department of Labor, Industrial Commission, Division of Veterans Services, workers' compensation, IDAPA 17.01.01, administrative procedure act, rule approval, legislative oversight, labor regulation, veterans services, House Commerce and Human Resources Committee, administrative bulletin, agency rules, Docket 17-0101-2301, Section 305, Subsection 01.a.
This resolution does not amend substantive statutes; it documents the House Commerce and Human Resources Committee’s review of temporary and pending administrative rules under Idaho Code section 67-5291. Its legal effect is to approve the reviewed rules for the Idaho Department of Labor, the Industrial Commission, and the Division of Veterans Services, except for one specified workers’ compensation subsection, thereby affecting the status of those administrative rules and the agencies and regulated parties subject to them.
The sentiment is generally procedural and supportive, reflecting routine legislative oversight and approval of most reviewed rules. The only negative or cautious sentiment is directed at one narrow Industrial Commission workers’ compensation provision, which the committee declined to approve. No recorded floor debate or vote history is available, so the overall tone appears administrative rather than controversial.
The only clear point of contention is IDAPA 17.01.01, Industrial Commission, Administrative Rules Under the Worker’s Compensation Law, Docket No. 17-0101-2301, Section 305, Subsection 01.a., which was not approved. That suggests concern about a specific workers’ compensation rule, likely affecting employers, insurers, injured workers, or claims administration. No other disputes are identified in the available materials, and there is no transcript evidence showing broader disagreement over the Department of Labor or Veterans Services rules.