A bill for an act relating to administrative fees charged by motor vehicle dealers, and making penalties applicable.
Summary
SSB1059 revises Iowa law governing fees charged by motor vehicle dealers when selling a vehicle. The bill renames the existing “documentary fee” as an “administrative fee” and keeps the fee tied to services the dealer performs on behalf of the customer, including preparing registration and title documents and related sale paperwork. It also updates the required consumer notice and disclosure language to reflect the new terminology.
The bill removes the current $180 cap on the fee. Under the proposal, a dealer could charge an administrative fee without a statutory maximum, but the fee would still have to be included in the advertised price of the vehicle and disclosed in offers and purchase agreements. The bill also retains the rule that the fee is not an official government fee and is not required by law, but may be charged by the dealer for these services.
Impact
The bill would amend Iowa Code section 322.19A by replacing references to “documentary fee” with “administrative fee,” changing the legal description of the charge, and eliminating the statutory ceiling on the amount dealers may charge. It would continue to require price-inclusion and disclosure obligations for dealers, while preserving enforcement under Iowa’s unlawful practice provisions, including potential injunctive relief, disgorgement, and civil penalties.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate or recorded support/opposition. Based on the bill text, the measure appears to be a dealer-friendly regulatory change that simplifies terminology and expands pricing flexibility, while still preserving consumer disclosure requirements. The absence of recorded votes or discussion prevents a more specific assessment of legislative sentiment.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the removal of the $180 cap on dealer fees, which could increase costs for vehicle buyers and raise consumer-protection concerns. Supporters would likely emphasize that the fee remains disclosed and is folded into the advertised price, while opponents may argue that eliminating the cap gives dealers too much discretion and could lead to higher, less predictable transaction costs. No specific stakeholder positions were included in the provided materials.
A bill for an act relating to the administration and regulation of matters associated with the operation, registration, and titling of motor vehicles, making penalties applicable, and including applicability provisions.(Formerly HSB 512.)
A bill for an act relating to the recycling of battery electric motor vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric motor vehicles, and making penalties applicable.(Formerly HSB 135.)
A bill for an act relating to motor vehicle glass repair, replacement, and insurance, making penalties applicable, and including applicability provisions.(See SF 573.)
A bill for an act relating to the recycling of battery electric motor vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric motor vehicles, and making penalties applicable.(See HF 548.)