A bill for an act relating to the placement of a child who is the subject of a pending delinquency petition in a supervised apartment living arrangement pursuant to a consent decree, and the circumstances under which the placement is paid by the state.(See SF 174.)
Summary
SSB1007 expands the range of placement options available to juvenile courts when a child is the subject of a pending delinquency petition and the case is resolved through a consent decree. Under current law, a court may use a consent decree to impose conditions such as supervision, restitution, work assignments, or placement in a group or family foster care setting if that is the least restrictive option. This bill adds supervised apartment living arrangement as another possible placement, but only when the court determines it is the least restrictive option.
The bill also addresses who pays for that placement. It provides that the Department of Health and Human Services is responsible for payment for foster care services when a child is placed in a supervised apartment living arrangement under a consent decree, so long as the arrangement meets standards established by department rule. In effect, the bill creates a new state-funded placement category within the juvenile delinquency system and ties reimbursement to compliance with HHS requirements.
Impact
The bill amends Iowa Code section 232.46 to authorize supervised apartment living arrangements as a disposition under a consent decree in delinquency cases, and amends section 234.35 to make HHS responsible for payment when that placement is ordered and meets departmental rules. It would therefore expand juvenile court placement authority and shift some costs for qualifying placements to the state, while also giving HHS rulemaking authority to define eligible supervised apartment living arrangements. The affected parties include juvenile courts, county attorneys, youth subject to delinquency petitions, supervised apartment providers, and HHS.
Sentiment
The available materials suggest a generally supportive, policy-focused approach rather than a contentious debate. The bill is framed as a targeted juvenile justice option that preserves the court’s least-restrictive-placement standard while adding a structured alternative to foster care. No committee transcripts or vote records were provided, so there is no direct evidence of opposition or amendment debate in the record supplied.
Contention
The main policy questions raised by the bill are whether supervised apartment living arrangements should be treated like other foster care placements for delinquency cases, and under what standards the state should pay for them. The least-restrictive-option requirement appears designed to limit use to appropriate cases, but the bill also gives HHS discretion to set eligibility requirements by rule, which could be a point of concern for providers or advocates seeking clarity. Potential contention could also arise over state costs, oversight, and whether this placement is suitable for juveniles in consent-decree cases compared with traditional foster care or group care.
Replaced by
A bill for an act relating to the placement of a child who is the subject of a pending delinquency petition in a supervised apartment living arrangement pursuant to a consent decree, and the circumstances under which the placement is paid by the state.(Formerly SSB 1007.)
A bill for an act relating to the placement of a child who is the subject of a pending delinquency petition in a supervised apartment living arrangement pursuant to a consent decree, and the circumstances under which the placement is paid by the state.(See HF 298.)
A bill for an act relating to the placement of a child who is the subject of a pending delinquency petition in a supervised apartment living arrangement pursuant to a consent decree, and the circumstances under which the placement is paid by the state.(Formerly SSB 1007.)
A bill for an act relating to the placement of a child who is the subject of a pending delinquency petition in a supervised apartment living arrangement pursuant to a consent decree, and the circumstances under which the placement is paid by the state. (Formerly HSB 39.) Effective date: 07/01/2025.
A bill for an act relating to child placements, including the prioritization of certain persons for child placement and the implementation of the 30 days to family model, and making an appropriation.(See HF 638, HF 1003.)
Practice of medicine; creating the Supervised Physicians Act; limiting scope of supervised practice; directing specified Boards to promulgate certain rules; requiring collaborative practice arrangements; creating certain exemptions; effective date.
Practice of medicine; creating the Supervised Physicians Act; limiting scope of supervised practice; directing specified Boards to promulgate certain rules; requiring collaborative practice arrangements; creating certain exemptions; effective date.