Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

Iowa House Bill HSB647

Introduced
1/29/26  

Caption

A bill for an act relating to chatbots, including deployer requirements and interactions with minors.(See HF 2715.)

Summary

HSB647 creates a new Iowa law chapter regulating chatbots and other public-facing artificial intelligence systems. It defines key terms such as artificial intelligence, chatbot, deployer, minor, output, and reasonable age verification. The bill requires chatbot deployers to maintain protocols to detect, respond to, report, and mitigate harm caused by a chatbot, and to limit collection and storage of user information to what is necessary for the chatbot’s purpose. The bill also places special restrictions on chatbot access by minors. In general, deployers must use reasonable age-verification measures to prevent minors from using or purchasing publicly available chatbots. The bill creates a narrow exception for chatbots designed primarily for mental health support, counseling, or therapy, but only if multiple safeguards are met, including a clear AI disclaimer, recommendation by a licensed professional after evaluation, significant testing documentation, peer-reviewed clinical trial evidence, parental disclosure, and risk-mitigation protocols. HSB647 gives enforcement authority to the attorney general, who may seek injunctions and civil penalties. Courts may impose penalties of up to $2,500 per violation, or $7,500 for violating an injunction, with state-collected penalties deposited into the general fund. The bill also creates a private right of action for a minor’s parent, guardian, or custodian to recover statutory damages or actual damages if a noncompliant chatbot is used by the minor. The bill’s impact on state law would be to establish one of Iowa’s first targeted regulatory frameworks for chatbot deployment, privacy practices, and youth access. It would affect AI developers, platform operators, and companies offering consumer chatbots, especially those marketing mental health tools or services to minors. It also adds a new enforcement and liability structure under Iowa law for violations involving chatbot safety and age verification. The available voting history suggests strong committee support, with an 18-0 report vote. No committee transcript was provided, so there is no recorded debate to indicate broader opposition or support. Based on the bill’s structure, likely points of contention would include the feasibility and cost of age verification, privacy concerns tied to identity checks, the breadth of deployer obligations, and whether the mental-health exception is too restrictive or too permissive.

Impact

The bill would add a new chapter to Iowa Code governing chatbot deployers, imposing safety, privacy, and age-verification duties on providers of publicly available AI chatbots. It would create civil enforcement by the attorney general, authorize injunctions and monetary penalties, and give parents, guardians, or custodians a private cause of action for violations involving minors. The measure would primarily affect AI developers, chatbot platforms, and companies offering consumer-facing or mental-health-related chatbot services.

Sentiment

The limited voting record shows clear support in committee, with an 18-0 report vote and no recorded dissent. Because no committee transcript is available, there is no direct evidence of debate, but the bill appears to have been framed as a consumer-protection and child-safety measure. The overall sentiment inferred from the available history is favorable, with attention focused on regulating AI chatbots rather than opposing the concept of regulation itself.

Contention

The most likely points of contention are the requirement for reasonable age verification, which could raise privacy, implementation, and cost concerns, and the mandate that deployers prioritize user safety over business interests. Another likely issue is the narrow exception for mental-health chatbots, which requires licensed-professional recommendation, clinical evidence, and extensive disclosures; supporters may view these as necessary safeguards, while critics may see them as too burdensome or difficult to satisfy. The bill’s private right of action and civil penalties may also be debated by industry stakeholders concerned about litigation exposure.

Companion Bills

IA HF 2715

Replaced by A bill for an act relating to chatbots, including deployer requirements and interactions with minors.(Formerly HSB 647.)

Previously Filed As

IA HF2715

A bill for an act relating to chatbots, including deployer requirements and interactions with minors.(Formerly HSB 647.)

IA HF2204

A bill for an act relating to the requirements for chatbot deployers, including required protocols, limitations on data collection, and requirements for minors to interact with artificial intelligence companions and therapeutic chatbots, and providing civil penalties, punitive penalties, and civil causes of action.

IA SB168

Regulate the use of chatbots by minors.

IA HB4083

Technology; deployers; AI chatbots; minors; age verification systems; emergency situations; effective date.

IA HSB611

A bill for an act establishing requirements and guidelines for chatbots, making appropriations, and providing civil penalties.(See HF 2507.)

IA HB295

Prohibits the development of artificial intelligence systems with certain capabilities involving interactions with minors (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

IA SSB3011

A bill for an act establishing requirements and guidelines for chatbots, making appropriations, and providing civil penalties.(See SF 2417.)

IA HB1188

Provides relative to protections for minors regarding use of chatbots

IA SB796

Artificial Intelligence Companion Chatbots and Minors Act; established, enforcement, civil penalty.

IA SF2415

A bill for an act relating to provider requirements concerning the mental health of users of an artificial intelligence chatbot, and providing civil penalties.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.