Iowa Senate Bill SJR5

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/19/23

Caption

A joint resolution calling for an Article V convention in order to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the number of terms that a person may serve in Congress, and requesting Congress to similarly propose such amendments.

Impact

If passed, SJR5 would function as a formal request to Congress to convene a national convention for the purpose of amending the Constitution. This could have far-reaching implications for state and federal relations, potentially recalibrating the balance of power by enabling states to directly influence federal governance. The call for fiscal restraint and term limits reflects a growing sentiment among some state legislators that the federal government is untenable in its current form, prompting a desire for systemic reform through state-led initiatives.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution 5 (SJR5) is a joint resolution introduced by Senator Green, calling for a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. The primary objective of this resolution is to propose amendments that would impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for members of Congress. This initiative is rooted in the belief that the federal government has overstepped its constitutional bounds, contributing to significant national debt and encroaching on the roles of state governments.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding SJR5. Supporters argue that imposing term limits could infuse fresh perspectives into Congress and decrease the influence of career politicians, while fiscal restraints could promote responsible budgeting at the federal level. However, opponents express concerns that such a convention could unravel essential constitutional protections and lead to unintended consequences. The fear of a 'runaway convention,' where broader amendments could be proposed beyond the intended scope, is particularly prevalent among critics, raising questions about the potential risks involved in altering the founding document of the United States.