SB769 makes targeted amendments to the statutory framework governing the Mauna Kea Stewardship and Oversight Authority created by Act 255 (2022). The bill clarifies the division of responsibilities between the Authority, the University of Hawaii, the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR), and individual lessees for conservation district use permits on Mauna Kea. In general, lessees would be the applicants for permits tied to their leased lands, while the Authority would take over permit approval/denial and compliance oversight after the transition period ends on July 1, 2028.
The bill also preserves a limited role for the Authority to seek permits for uses that benefit Mauna Kea as a whole rather than a specific lessee, such as common-area improvements and repairs. In addition, it specifies that certain existing conservation district use permits held by or naming the University of Hawaii as of July 1, 2028, will not be transferred to the Authority, even though the University’s broader rights, powers, and duties related to Mauna Kea are otherwise transferred on that date. The bill further provides that preexisting leases, permits, and related documents remain in effect unless specifically amended, and that references to DLNR or BLNR in Mauna Kea-related documents will be construed as references to the Authority after the transfer date.
Impact
SB769 would amend chapter 195H, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Act 255 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2022) to refine the post-transition governance structure for Mauna Kea. It shifts permit application responsibility to lessees for lease-specific conservation district use permits, transfers regulatory oversight from BLNR to the Mauna Kea Stewardship and Oversight Authority after July 1, 2028, and preserves BLNR authority only for permits sought by the Authority for shared or non-lessee-specific uses. The bill also protects specified University of Hawaii-related conservation district use permits from automatic transfer and maintains the validity of existing leases, permits, and related agreements unless amended by agreement.
Sentiment
The bill appears generally supportive of the existing Mauna Kea stewardship framework and is framed as a clarification and refinement rather than a major policy reversal. Its findings emphasize restoring trust, balancing cultural and scientific interests, and implementing the Legislature’s earlier reforms in a more workable way. No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of opposition or support from hearings in the supplied materials.
Contention
The main points of potential contention are the allocation of permitting authority and the treatment of existing University of Hawaii permits. Some stakeholders may favor keeping BLNR as the permit-approving body, while others may support the bill’s move to place that role with the Authority after the transition period. Another likely issue is the bill’s decision to exclude a list of existing telescope-related conservation district use permits from transfer, which could be viewed as preserving continuity for current observatory operations or, alternatively, as limiting the Authority’s full control over Mauna Kea. The bill also distinguishes between lessee-specific uses and common-area uses, which may raise questions about who should bear responsibility for applications and compliance.
Relating to the authority of the Wood County Central Hospital District of Wood County, Texas, to provide brain and memory care services to residents of the hospital district through the creation and operation of brain and memory health care services districts.