SB14 would create a new temporary rule for property, homeowner’s, and renter’s insurance in Hawaii beginning January 1, 2026. Under the bill, insurers generally could not raise a policyholder’s premium at renewal unless they first submit a detailed report with actuarial data to both the policyholder and the Insurance Commissioner, show that the requested increase is unrelated to natural disasters, and obtain the Commissioner’s approval before the increase takes effect.
The bill also adds enforcement provisions. An insurer that violates the new section would be subject to a fine and would have to provide restitution to affected policyholders. The measure is structured as a sunset law and would repeal itself on January 1, 2029, making it a temporary policy intervention rather than a permanent change to insurance regulation.
Impact
SB14 would amend Chapter 431 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes by adding a new section to Article 10E governing premium increases for property, homeowner’s, and renter’s insurance. It would limit existing insurer discretion at renewal, override the cited provisions in sections 431:14-103 and 431:14-103.3 to the extent of conflict, and expand the Insurance Commissioner’s role by requiring prior approval for most renewal increases. It would also create new penalty and restitution exposure for insurers that raise premiums without complying with the bill’s process.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and available legislative context, the measure appears to be framed as consumer-protection legislation aimed at addressing insurance affordability and premium stability. There are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition from hearings or floor action. The bill’s referral to the Senate Committees on CPN and JDC suggests it was still in early committee review at the time of the available record.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the bill’s restriction on premium increases and the requirement for Insurance Commissioner approval, which could be viewed by insurers as a significant regulatory burden and by supporters as necessary oversight. Another likely issue is the bill’s exclusion of natural-disaster-related actuarial support from the justification for increases, which may be controversial in a state where catastrophe risk is a major driver of insurance costs. The bill also leaves penalty and restitution amounts blank in the text provided, indicating unresolved drafting details that could affect enforcement.
Article V Convention; process for appointing commissioners and alternate commissioners to represent the State of Alabama at Article V Convention established